Thursday, December 25, 2008

Christmas Day


Even after all these years (and that is more than a half century for me) I never get tired of Christmas Day with family--and we had it with my extended family for the first time in six years on Christmas Day. Here we are in Texas earlier today--the tripod didn't make it, so Scott put his camera on a tall box and we waited patiently for it to shoot! Kudos to Scott for some great photos (you can see them in my Flickr account, which is linked at the bottom of the page.
We have thoroughly enjoyed this whole Advent and Christmas season, from the celebrations with our church family in Ohio, to our family times, to the presence of our first grandchild (the beautiful baby boy in the front row). Looking at that picture reminds me of the blessing of a heritage of faith--my parents raised us to know God, we have sought to do the same, and now I am watching as my daughter and son in law take similar steps.
Most of all, though, it seems to me that Christmas is a time that makes me think more deeply about God's gift of salvation through his Son to me, and how my life is and needs to be given over to making much of Jesus. Easter does this, too, but Christmas seems even more powerful in my heart--perhaps because of the length of our Advent observance. In any event, it has been another wonderful season for me, and I trust it has been for you, too!

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Searching for the Star of Bethlehem (from Christianity Today)

This article has the latest data from various attempts to identify the star of Bethlehem. The latest suggestion posits the star as being the conjunction of Jupiter and Venus, which we have been watching in the southern sky for the last month or so. However, this work by Reneke posits a date of 2 B.C., well after Herod's death, which doesn't fit biblical data.

I think the most pertinent data in the article is this section:

The story in Matthew's Gospel seems to indicate that the people of Judea were oblivious to the Star. So, at least one scholar has taken a different approach to identifying the Star of Bethlehem.
"I set out to find what a stargazer of Roman times would have recognized as the star of a new Judean king," wrote retired Rutgers University astronomer
Michael Molnar in the preface of his 1999 book, The Star of Bethlehem: The Legacy of the Magi.
Owen Gingerich, professor emeritus of astronomy at Harvard University, thinks that Molnar is on the right track. "He has made a serious attempt to situate the Star in terms contemporary with the event, tying it in with numismatical evidence and Roman imperial horoscopes," he said. "Too many have tried to formulate the Star in modern terms, without considering the first century context."
Molnar said it was an ancient coin that initiated his Star quest. "That coin had Aries the Ram on it," he said in an interview. "My research of several astrological manuscripts from Roman times showed that the kingdom of Judea was represented by Aries the Ram."
Molnar's extensive research in primary sources led him to a set of conditions that "pointed like an astrological road sign to Jerusalem." On April 17, 6 B.C., the royal planet Jupiter rose as a morning star and was eclipsed (technical term: occulted) by the moon while it was located within the constellation Aries.
Later the earth in its inner orbit passed Jupiter and for a week in December of 6 B.C. Jupiter appeared to be standing still or drifting backwards. The astronomical term is retrograde motion, and could explain why Matthew 2:9 states that the Star stood still over Bethlehem.
(The birth of Jesus around 6 B.C. fits what scholars know from other sources, since the gospels indicate that Jesus was born before the death of Herod. Herod's death is believed to have occurred around 4 B.C., just after an eclipse that's mentioned in ancient sources. That Jesus was born B.C. is due to a calendar miscalculation centuries later.)


If correct, Molnar's data would allow for the Magi to see a sign that would cause them to arrive on or near the time of birth, the December date would be appropriate (the church father Hippolytus in the 2nd century A.D. affirmed a December 25 date), and it all times out before Herod's death in 4 B.C. (which it must since Herod sought to kill the infant Jesus).

Thursday, December 11, 2008

OK, this is silly, but still funny.

Extraterrestrials May Already be Saved - TIME Magazine

How did I miss this important theological news?

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

The Doghouse

Every man who has ever even thought of a household appliance as a gift for his wife (guilty here) had better check out The Doghouse, an insightful warning. Make sure that, after the introduction, you check out the "See what life is like inside The Doghouse" link! This site is an ad, but it is so well done, men should check it out--or else!

Saturday, December 06, 2008

Newsflash: Legalized Prostitution & Drug Use Has Created a Crime Problem!

This story from the AP news service reports that the city of Amsterdam is trying to fight back against undesired intrusions by organized crime into the world of the city's legalized brothels and marijuana "coffee houses." These locations, where prostitution and marijuana purchase and use are allowed, have seen a spike in the presence of other criminal activity, from money laundering by drug dealers to violent crimes.

Amsterdam's solution is to close some of these locations, while leaving others open in certain specified districts. The aim is to reduce the city's image as "a free zone for criminals" to "a tolerant and crazy place," according to Lodewijk Asscher, a city council member.

Mr. Asscher is mistaken, and sadly so, if he believes that lessening legal bad behavior will lessen the presence of illegal bad behavior. Dabbling in sin never lessens its power. Cities where these activities are illegal and prosecuted still deal with criminality, but the problem would be exponentially worse if some forms of bad behavior are tolerated--it only creates an environment where other forms will thrive. Once there is no sense of morality (no God in reality), then anything becomes permissible.

Friday, December 05, 2008

Scrooge Lives! (from Christianity Today)

This article is not about a lack of Christmas spirit, but rather the latest analysis of the giving habits of American Christians, and the picture is not a pretty one. Most commonly cited statistics that have shown low levels of giving are, apparently, higher than reality--which means our giving is even worse than we thought. I would encourage us all to read this report and consider its content carefully.

Thursday, December 04, 2008

A Great Analysis of "BDS"

This fine article in National Review Online entitled Bush Derangement Syndrome, by Jason Lee Steorts, provides one of the best overviews of what happened in our national dialog that turned opposition to the President and his war policy in Iraq into a collective chorus of illogic--debate degenerating into demogoguery. It is the second of three parts. The first installment is here. The third comes tomorrow.

Steorts captures the thoughts many others have expressed, and some I have thought but never brought together this well.

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

Hundreds of Complaints Force Zoo to Break Ties with Creation Museum (from Christianpost.com)


You can read the article here, but it seems that the Cincinnati Zoo and the Creation Museum had decided to offer a discount on admission when you showed that you had bought a ticket to the other venue. The offer was only available three days before hundreds of complaints to the zoo caused them to withdraw from the deal. The Creation Museum will honor the deal anyway for the next few weeks ($9.00 off admission).

The Zoo is a private entity, as is the Creation Museum, and it would seem that this would be no different than offering a discount to any constituency. The complainers are certainly not motivated by their desire to see more people visit the zoo, nor do they seem very tolerant of groups or entities with views different than their own. But the zoo had to make the decision that would be best for itself (it is, after all, in need of public good will, support, and ticket buyers), so I will not fault them for their choice.

I'm just surprised (and probably shouldn't be) at the strong negative reaction.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Report: Rewards Offered in India for Killing Christians

The going rate to kill pastor: $250.

World Net Daily's report on the situation in Orissa, India, cites various leaders of Christian groups working there. The main culprits are leaders of radical Hindu groups that desire to see all other religions removed from Indian life.

The current persecution in Orissa is across the country from Mumbai, where terrorists believed to be Pakistani militants have killed nearly 200 people in coordinated attacks against luxury hotels, a Jewish center, a meditation center, and a train station.

Monday, November 24, 2008

eHarmony Caves In To Lawsuit; Offers Same Sex Matchmaking; Pro-Family Groups Protest

News has probably reached most of us of eHarmony's decision to settle a lawsuit with a homosexual plaintiff who sued them for discrimination. The company was not forced to this settlement; they chose it rather than fight the battle in court. It was a battle others have fought and won, but eHarmony chose not to.

This story in the Christian Post gives details and reaction.

I was disappointed at first when I heard the news; now I am disturbed that the company would rather limit financial losses and continue in business than stand for the principles that governed its founding and were the reasons for eHarmony's strong promotion among Christians and other pro-marriage, pro-family groups.

Monday, November 17, 2008

Baptizing Everything but the Wallet (from Out of Ur)

Check out this cartoon.

"Fort Worth is 4th Episcopal Diocese to Break Away"

The Christian Post reports on the continuing defections from the Episcopal Church of the U.S. over the consecration of an openly gay bishop. The splintering of the U.S. group is further pressure that may lead to an official breach in the worldwide Anglican communion. Go here for the story. Those diocese that leave face lawsuits over property as well as issues related to their identity in the Anglican structure.

"Detroit Automakers a Relic of the Past" by Michael Barone on National Review Online

In this article, one of my favorite commentators takes a view similar to my own on the bailout of the auto companies. I discovered in the article that he is also a native of Michigan (where I also grew up) and feels the pain I do thinking about the difficulties the state faces and will face. Read the article here.

What if Starbucks Marketed Like a Church? A Parable.

I found this on Todd Rhoades' Monday Morning Insight. Enjoy.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Five Reasons Why Bailing out the Auto Industry is a Bad Idea

In the midst of the current economic maelstrom, we find banks asking for government help to cover bad mortgages that should not have been offered. We have insurers looking for help to deal with losses related to the mortgage crisis. We have two federally managed agencies that offered these mortgages and then encouraged people to buy securities backed by them needing huge infusions of government money to cover yet more losses.

Out of a desire to help, Congress responded to the Treasury Secretary's pleas and created a $700 billion program where the the secretary could exercise broad authority to intervene and help the economy. Everyone assumed he would buy up bad bank assets and stabilize the market. Now he has said he probably won't buy those assets after all, and would instead give money to institutions to encourage them to free up credit. A good lesson to learn: before giving someone three quarters of a trillion dollars to spend, make sure you know how it will be spent.

Meanwhile the Big Three automakers (we should say U.S. big two and a half, since Chrysler isn't really as big and until its recent spinoff was owned by German Daimler Motors. The real big three are, of course, Toyota, Honda, and Nissan) have come, hat in hand, saying they won't be able to pay bills by the end of 2008 without a major "loan" from the government.

I'm not sure I understand the wisdom of the first steps taken above (although I was not favorably inclined toward the bailout, the sense of panic created by the media required something happen). Many of the steps already taken do not seem to have helped. Maybe other steps will. However, I can tell you that helping the automakers ought not to be done, at least not without major stipulations that they probably wouldn't accept. Here are the reasons I hold this view.
  1. Autoworkers' compensation is twice the national average for manufacturing jobs. Executive salaries may be outrageously high (how much one should make for failing to make your company profitable is a tough question). However, what is killing the industry is high labor costs. A recent study I read showed autoworker compensation cost at nearly $80 an hour, by the time all employer costs are added to wages. That is twice what factory workers in other manufacturing jobs in America make. The UAW leader has said flatly, "no more concessions" and said the solution is to get the economy going, which to him means freeing up credit so Americans will pony up the big bucks to buy new cars whose labor costs make them more expensive than imports, while quality concerns continue to abound--just examine almost any issue of Consumer Reports to see test data that ranks imports ahead of domestic cars.
  2. There is already protection for businesses that can't cover expenses--it is called bankruptcy. Our various U.S. airlines have made this a revolving door of protection, and the big ones are still around. Bankruptcy would allow the companies to reorganize, free themselves of current labor costs, renegotiate realistic contracts, and emerge healthier, even if smaller.
  3. Chrysler is about to disappear. Daimler couldn't make it profitable. GM (as bad off as it is) has been trying to buy it, which would remove it from independent operation. Let it go the way of the Studebaker, the Nash, the Packard, and other auto companies no longer in existence. In a free market economy, companies do not have a divine right to exist. Bad management, poor products, and bloated costs are not a good business model. If those are the facts related to any company it will sink. It should.
  4. Short term pain is not a reason to avoid good decisions. Yes, our economy will take a hit if the automakers go into bankruptcy. Some will lose jobs. Wages will probably decline for remaining auto workers. But while these are political landmines, they are economic realities. If the government becomes the protector of all failing or struggling businesses, propping them up and making sure wages stay at unsustainable levels, we will become the same kind of economic powerhouse that Britain and France are--strong, but certainly not of the same caliber as the U.S. economy. It is a move toward what is called social democracy, and a repudiation of free market capitalism.
  5. How long have people known that U.S. cars needed to be more economical and more reliable? Decades? How long have imports been eating U.S. automakers' lunch? Yet, who set the pace on introducing more economy, more quality, more hybrids? The import companies did. I have often repeated the old line, "Doing the same thing that failed over and over again and expecting a different result is not persistence, it is insanity."

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

We have a new President


President-elect Barack Obama's convincing victory over John McCain leaves many of us conflicted. Earlier posts make clear my reasons why I could not support the Obama candidacy. However, many of us who have thought much about issues of racial reconciliation have a part of us that rejoices in the fact that an African American was nominated by a major party and elected by a clear majority of our citizens.


I find myself disappointed in the results because of the positions that Senator Obama has taken in his political career and during this election. But I also believe that any doubt that America is the place, where as he said in his victory speech, anything can happen, including ethnic differences not making a difference in a national election, has been soundly addressed and quieted. It would be naive to say that "racism" does not exist--some of his supporters freely admitted that Senator Obama received their votes because of his skin color, and there were, undoubtedly, some who voted for Senator McCain because of the color of his opponent. Yet Americans have demonstrated to the world (again) that those who belong to minorities can and do achieve greatness in this diverse republic.


The new president will be my president. I will oppose his policies when they conflict with God's Word or when, applying what wisdom I have, I conclude that he is wrong. However, I will pray fervently for him, specifically the following:


  1. I pray for God to open his eyes and heart to His truth, and that he will receive the grace of hearing and obeying the Word of God.

  2. I pray that, as a professing follower of Jesus, he will seek to conform his life to the pattern given to us by the Lord Jesus.

  3. I pray that God will grant him wisdom to lead our nation.

  4. I pray for his personal protection and for that of his family.

  5. I pray for a profound change of heart regarding the sanctity of the lives of the unborn.

I encourage all who love the Lord and seek the mercy of God for our nation to do the same.


Saturday, November 01, 2008

John Piper's Heart in the 2008 Election

As you might expect, John Piper takes a view that almost everyone will find either troubling or exhilarating, or both. Watch and see what you think.

Luther's First Thesis and Last Words :: Desiring God

This article can give you some insight into Luther's thoughts and desires, as a follow up to my previous post.

Friday, October 31, 2008

Happy Reformation Day!


October 31, 1517 was the day that Martin Luther posted his 95 Theses to the church door in Wittenburg, Germany. The theses addressed various current Roman Catholic practices and were triggered by the sale of indulgences to build St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. The sale, conducted by the flamboyant and effective Johann Tetzel, offered for a price the freedom of a soul from purgatory and direct entrance into heaven. A relatively common practice at the time, its lack of scriptural warrant led Luther to challenge it and related teachings of the church. Luther's posting was meant to be a challenge to debate these issues, but became instead a rallying point for those questioning the church's understanding of salvation generally. Luther himself had come to believe that people are justified by faith alone, and thought that the Church, when pushed, would come to the same conclusion. His misreading of that result, along with his firm commitment to the authority of Scripture over the church to settle matters of faith, was the central driving force that led to Luther's excommunication from the Roman Catholic Church and what we now refer to as the Reformation.
All Protestants, including we who are in the Baptist tradition, trace our development back to this one moment in history, so Reformation Day is a day we should all mark with great thankfulness to God and to a German monk who saw the glorious gospel truth and let it change him as well as the church.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Randy Alcorn--one of my favorite writers--offers clear words on the election

Not Cool: Obama's Pro-abortion Stance, and Christians enabling him is Randy Alcorn's lengthy blog entry, complete with links and citations, to give Christians concerned about issues of life something to think about. He includes a link to Donald Miller's endorsement of Obama, even though Miller is prolife. I have tried to discover Obama's plan for reducing abortions, and it comes down to more birth control availability, along with urging greater caution and responsibility to teens in regard to sex--something that just doesn't sound all that effective.

I agree with many who argue that we need leadership that is concerned with the poor and weak in our society. But with Obama's commitment to sign the Freedom of Choice Act as the "first thing" he will do as president, he has shown not only disregard for the weakest and most helpless among us, and a willingness to allow underage teens to get abortions without parental knowledge, but he has taken the wrong side in the great defining moral issue of our day.

John McCain Abortion Montage

Just to keep the comparison clear, view this video after seeing the one below.

Barack Obama Abortion Montage

Having had a question about this issue, I post this video so you can hear his words on the subject of abortion.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

On the Upcoming Presidential Election

The previous post (below) lets you know that I cannot, in good conscience as a Christian, vote for Barack Obama. This is not due to his party, nor to his belonging (until recently) to a church whose theology was far from evangelical (the United Church of Christ is perhaps the most liberal denomination theologically in Protestantism). I have voted for candidates of both major parties in my time, and supported non-believers as well as people of various churches and religions.

I cannot vote for Barack Obama because he not only supports abortion, but when given the opportunities to moderate his views to a level that even Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion groups accept, he has failed to do so. In fact, his political record is one of calculated choices against the preservation of unborn human beings and of those born alive due to a botched abortion procedure. A number of other candidates on the ballot oppose abortion and infancticide, including John McCain. Those looking for a "purist" who represents this view can choose from any of them. I will vote for John McCain, and will explain that choice below.

As a Christian, I have thought long about the duties of government that are assigned by God, drawn not only from the Gospels, Acts, Romans 13, and 1 Timothy 2, but also from the origins and functions of government seen in Genesis, the establishment of Israel, and the writings of the prophets to various kings and kingdoms. As I see it, there are three main categories of responsiblity. They are the protection of civil order--including protecting the weak in society, the upholding of law and justice, and the punishment of evildoers. Many different forms of government can perform these functions, not just democracies, republics, and constitutional monarchies.

Human laws, which governments create and enforce, are the imposition on all citizens of a morality decided upon by the government. So, the old canard, "you can't impose your morality on people" is only true is terms of personal obedience--government can, does, and should impose morality--it has no choice. The question is whose morality; and that--in our society--is decided by the representatives elected by the people.

Sometimes our laws coincide with God's law. For example, laws that punish theft and murder coincide in value, if not in actual punishment or practice, with clear teaching from God's Word.


Sometimes they do not. Laws that protect a supposed "right" to abortion or the right of parents to choose not to feed and hydrate babies born with "undesirable" birth defects would fit here. So would, in my view, Nebraska's law allowing children to be abandoned without question by parents at any hospital in the state (allowing parents to dismiss their God given responsibility for the children they bring into the world).

And sometimes they deal with matters not directly addressed by the Bible, where principles from the Bible may be extrapolated to apply to situations (i.e., protecting civil order and punishing evildoers may result in nations going to war). Christians often differ on just how these principles apply. Matters from tax policy to building codes to educational policy to traffic regulation often fall within this category--are we protecting the weak, protecting private property, preserving civil order, etc., by adopting or rejecting a particular law.

Barack Obama's election to the presidency would further the cause of laws that are opposed to God's morality related to life issues. It would mean new Supreme Court justices would be committed to this morality. It would mean the likely control of all branches of government by those holding this perspective. Abortion and infanticide would become more acceptable and legal, not less, in this set of circumstances.

I believe that Barack Obama's policies, on the whole, might make my life more comfortable, with his proposed tax cuts and help for middle income families with government support. I know that he has concern for the disenfranchised in society and plans to provide more government support for a larger segment of the population on many fronts--health care, social welfare services, etc. I am not personally a believer that government intervention programs for the poor accomplish what they intend--having served an inner city church for seven years, and being heavily involved in inner city ministry for another eighteen years, I believe that private (usually evangelical Christian) help has yielded the positive results that a welfare/entitlement mentality has not. That said, I would not oppose him for our differences here.

At issue is this. I live in a representative democracy. I choose those who make the laws under which all of us will live. Mine may be a small voice, but it is still a privilege given me by God through the kind providence of being born in the United States, which has a constitution granting that right. Therefore, as a Christian citizen, I have the opportunity of choosing representatives who will lead my nation according to a morality that brings either God's approval or curse. Since I am to seek the welfare of my city (and by extension, nation), I must choose representatives most closely in line with those values

In those times when I am faced with less than perfect options, I should choose based upon which candidate will do the most to further laws and values in line with biblical values, or do the least damage to current biblically coherent laws. I do not believe in only "making a statement" with a vote--choosing a candidate with no conceivable chance to win who is 100% right over a candidate who is less right but whose election would both be possible and protect the nation from the greater evil that might result from another candidate's success.

So, Barack Obama's embrace of morality that is contradictory to the Bible makes him a non-option for me. John McCain's positions are generally in line with biblical morality, and while on some issues I have strong disagreements with him, they are not significant biblically. McCain has a chance to win, slim though it appears to be right now. Third party candidates do not.

Speaking for myself, I have determined that my best course of action as a Christian citizen is to vote for John McCain.

Great Review of an Important Book on Obama

This review of David Freddoso's book "The Case Against Barack Obama" does two great services. First, it saves having to read the book for those who don't want to. Second, it provides Armstrong's credible testimony as a Chicago resident that the information presented in the book is factual. Freddoso published in July, and his appearances on call in shows have been targeted by Obama supporters who jam the phone lines with calls to protest his presence and to keep people from asking questions. Rather than rewriting what Armstrong said, follow the link to the review.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Get Service

This thought provoking video was sent to me by a friend...

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

CHS Powderpuff Cheerleaders

Here are the Junior Class Powder Puff Game Cheerleaders from Cedarville High at halftime. Can you find my son? Oh the pride we feel!!!

Monday, September 22, 2008

Been down for a while, just like our power

Well, I haven't blogged much the last few weeks--first busyness, then powerlessness. Not some sort of spiritual heavyness, but our electrical power. The remnants of Hurricane Ike blew through Ohio and turned off the lights for most of southern Ohio. Some here in our town still do not have power, eight days later. Internet and email were also down, so there was an enforced silence for some of us, which was actually a benefit in some ways. I couldn't answer emails I didn't receive, nor worry about internet news I couldn't read!

Now the power is back on for us here, and I'll get back to occasional blog entries.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Somebody Needs To Call Their Contractor!


This house was built in Tressheide, Germany as a means of allowing occupants to "view life from a new perspective." It was not the result of a contractor holding the plans upside down. Either way, living there would probably be difficult to get used to.

Tuesday, September 09, 2008

From Joel Rosenberg: AL QAEDA TARGETS ARAB EVANGELIST OPERATING IN U.S. FOR PREACHING THE GOSPEL TO MUSLIMS


This story is one that needs to be read and then prayed about. I've read other reports on this brave Coptic priest, Zakaria Botros, who has now fled to the U.S. for his own safety and to continue his work, but this is a great summary. You can find his website here.

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

"Thank you."

These two simple words were on my mind as I drove to the Somers’ family home in western Illinois. Being a parsonage, the home not only belonged to the church Al has been serving for eight years, but it spoke of the vocation that had been his calling all of his adult life, and into which he was born during the ministry of his pastor/father.

I knew these two words were terribly inadequate for my task, since what I had to be grateful for and what Al had to do with it encompassed so much about my life that has been good. I also know how much I wanted to say these words now, because Al wouldn’t be here much longer.

Al and Judy were no strangers to adversity and illness. Ministry in hard places and times had been their lot for much of their service. In the midst of these circumstances, they still found many joys and friends along the way. Eight years ago, a diagnosis of incurable leukemia and a painful departure from a long term ministry was coupled with one of their best blessings—a call to serve a church that seemed ideally suited to grow under Al’s pastoral care. The leukemia was controlled, and care seemed to flow as much into Al and Judy’s lives from their congregation as did their care toward the flock. Both thrived.

Then came the news of colon cancer, and the growing realization that it was not going to be overcome as the leukemia had been. Having been told his remaining time would be measured in days and not months, I began to lay plans to pay one final visit to someone who had shaped my life and ministry as much as anyone I have known. I got there just in time.

Al became my youth pastor when I was in 8th grade, and for two years he led our church’s youth ministry. It was one of those churches, that as I look back, put the “fun” in “fundamental,” and Al’s arrival was followed months later by one pastor’s departure, and the arrival of another who didn’t believe in youth pastors. Al soldiered on as best he could, and faithfully led our teens. More than that, he took a personal interest in me that included discipleship training. He was the first to challenge me toward regular Bible study and prayer, and show me ways both to do so and to benefit from the exercise. When the Lord moved him on, we stayed in touch through occasional letters (I was the more frequent writer, but to be fair, he did have a new church to serve). I never had another youth pastor like him, but the seeds he planted took root, and my sense of calling to ministry became clear.

Our correspondence continued through my college years, and took a new turn when one letter offered the possibility of coming to assist him in the church to which he had been called less than a year before. A visit to the church ensued, and my life’s direction changed much more than just geographically.

From the first day as Al’s assistant at First Baptist Church of San Bernardino, I was introduced to ministry through a true apprenticeship. I read Scripture for the first time in a funeral my first week on the job. The first person I baptized was Al—he made me get in the tank and practice on him so I wouldn’t lose anybody when the real thing came along. Back then he had three messages to prepare each week, so he usually asked me to do one. Perhaps his boldest move was to decide that we would preach through books together, with one of us taking a passage, then the other picking up the next week where the first left off. I was going to seminary at the time, and found that Al’s practical training was enriching my class work immeasurably. Few others came into Sermon Preparation class with the experience Al had provided me, and few had the chance to field test what they were learning in school in ministry that was given through Al’s generous investment in me.

What made this even more amazing was the way he and Judy welcomed me into their lives and family. Sunday dinner was always at their house, as well as at least one other meal each week. I got to be more than just a babysitter for their kids—they treated me like a beloved uncle, and I had the joy of entering into their lives—attending soccer games, having them stay at my place, and giving them rides everywhere. When my interest in my wife first developed and deepened, but my demonstrations of my affection were not moving fast enough to seal the deal, it was Judy who told me that I needed to sit with Kathy in church NOW. So I did. Of course, she clued Kathy in on this, to make sure there was room next to her in the pew!

Al married us, and he and Judy sang in the service. Their family continued to be a blessing to us, and when God called us away to my first senior pastorate, Al was instrumental in helping that process, too. As our ministry saw God’s blessing, I was conscious of the fact that much of what I did, I did because Al taught me how to do it. When I did a funeral and people remarked on its poignancy, I knew that it was because Al taught me how to make it personal. When a wedding couple rejoiced in the service they had, it was due in large part to Al’s training in how to put a wedding together.

Until his pastorate at Checkrow, Al’s ministry had usually been in difficult environments. Yet he worked faithfully where God had placed him. After my departure from San Bernardino, Al repeated this apprenticing process in two more men’s lives. For a time, all three of us had more visible fruit in ministry than Al was experiencing. Yet all of us would have to confess that the fruit we saw was not just ours, but Al’s. His commitment to multiplying what God had done in him can be seen in thriving churches and ministries in California, the Midwest, and even overseas, who have never met him.

So I was able to arrive and speak one more time to this man who had given me so much. Judy, Steve, Elizabeth, and I sat around his bed and shared some precious memories and some laughter over the past. He was weak, but he was clear headed, and once again, he blessed me—literally, with a prayer committing me to continuing in God’s service. I prayed for him, too, thanking God through my tears for Al’s life of faithfulness, and asking God to welcome him home soon if a miracle healing was not in store. I told Al that I didn’t know how to say “thank you” for so much to one man in one moment. From a human perspective, he taught me about ministry, he was the reason I met my wife and have my family, and he showed me in practical terms how to walk with God.

I left, and the next day Al was no longer able to speak. He fell asleep Sunday night, August 31; and at 1:00 the next morning, Judy woke up and found that Al had left for Heaven.

I love Al and Judy Somers and their family, and my appreciation for his legacy of faithfulness will continue, in part through me. It is my prayer that I will be found to have been similarly faithful when I join him in the Savior’s presence.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

An Anomaly or a Break in the Dam?

This story, reported by Todd Rhoades' Monday Morning Insight, is notable for two reasons. First is the content. Irving Bible Church's elders made the decision to allow their female Pastor to Women, Jackie Roese, to preach Sunday in the worship service--the first time a woman had been given the right to do so there. IBC is a conservative, evangelical Bible church with strong ties to Dallas Theological Seminary, and this marks the first time of which I am aware that one of the Bible churches within that circle has had a woman preach. Further, the elders have indicated their belief that this is the proper theological direction for the church--espousing what they call "an ethic in progress." Even so, they have concluded that the role of elder is given solely to men, so Mrs. Roese's preaching will be under their authority.

This leads me to the second notable fact--this represents an attempt to place the ability of a woman to preach to the congregation within a "complementarian" framework--that is, it maintains the idea that there are distinctions in roles between men and women within the church (the home would be the second venue of such distinctions, but is not discussed in this report). Most who believe that women are free to preach in churches hold "egalitarian" perspectives (that there are no continuing distinctions of roles between male and female within the church--some would add the home as well--based on their interpretation of Galatians 3:28 and the view that restrictions in 1 Corinthians and 1 Timothy apply only to the specific cultures and times in which those passages were written). IBC's elders have concluded that women may exercise a preaching gift over women and men.

Is preaching the same thing as exercising authority? And if so, should a woman do so? For most of us, preaching/teaching carries more than the idea of dispensing information--it involves a call to response. It would seem that a preacher, by virtue of his (or her) activity, is in some way exercising authority. In 1 Timothy 2:12, Paul says he does not "permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man..." in the context of public worship, basing this on both the created order (man was created first, then woman) and order of deception in the fall (the woman led the way in being deceived). Some look at verse 12 and see two activities--she may not teach and she may not exercise authority. Others (also complementarians) believe the grammar points to the idea of "teaching as an authoritative leader." It would seem that the elders at IBC have opted for this view and then said that, as long as they (the authoritative leaders of the church) have asked her to preach the Word, then her teaching is actually under their authority.

This is a similar paradigm as was used by Kay Arthur of Precept Ministries in settings where she taught men and women in church gatherings. I'm told that she would even wear a hat to symbolize that she was teaching under her husband's authority and that of the church leaders.

In some of my travels overseas, I have observed that women often fill roles in churches that would be seen by most American complementarians as those that should be filled by men. In some cases those churches make no distinction between male and female roles, but other times it is clear that women are leading prayer, leading singing, taking the offering, or even preaching, only under the authority of male pastors or elders.

Whatever their reasoning, IBC's elders' decision has already had the effect of causing the President of DTS, Dr. Mark Bailey, to remove himself from the list of regular guest speakers at the church. Pastor Tom Nelson, well known and respected leader of Denton Bible Church, has spoken out against this decision as well. Whether it will prove to be an anomaly that isolates IBC from its fellow Bible churches, or the first crack in a dam among them, is a question whose answer will only emerge with time.

Monday, August 18, 2008

Son of Hamas Leader Now Follows Jesus


This Haaretz interview with Masah Yousef, son of Sheikh Hassan Yousef, the leader of Hamas tells of the son's rejection of Islam and his conversion to faith in Jesus Christ. The son, now living in California, may well find his life in danger has this report has made its way around the world, including this abbreviated interview on Fox News.

Never be surprised by what God can do.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Follow Up on Todd Bentley--The Collapse of a Ministry

I wrote earlier about Todd Bentley's ministry; now it seems his revival in Lakeland is over and his marriage is ending. I received this article by Lee Grady, editor of Charisma magazine (not something I normally read). He discusses his reaction to the Bentley tailspin and why it happened. John Piper's blog picks up the story and reminds us all that lack of doctrinal understanding and lack of discernment go hand in hand

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Letters to Putin

The invasion of Georgia by Russia is a serious matter, but Kathleen Parker manages to present a powerful comparison of responses to it from America's three major political leaders in Letters to Vlad in National Review Online. Make sure you read all three.

Monday, August 11, 2008

Bob Newhart, Pastoral Counselor?

OK, a lot of us just might wish to practice this approach to counseling. (NOTE: I don't watch this show, and don't endorse it, but this clip is worth seeing)

An Open Letter to Brett Favre


Ethics Daily.com has this excellent open letter written by Pastor Ed Hogan to Brett Favre about his recent highly publicized indecision and then return to football. It analyzes what has happened from a very important perspective, so follow the links above to read some good thinking that has already been ignored.

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Joel Osteen's Wife Not Living Her Best Life Right Now


This report details a lawsuit against Victoria Osteen, co-pastor of Lakewood church with her husband, Joel. She is alleged to have assaulted a flight attendant over a stain found on Mrs. Osteen's first class seat. The FAA already fined Mrs. Osteen $3000 for interfering with the flight crew, but the assaulted attendant apparently has read Mr. Osteen's book and is seeking to bring her prosperity into reality. She's asking for an apology and 10% of Mrs. Osteen's net worth as punitive damages!
UPDATE: NOT GUILTY! The jury finds that the claims of the flight attendant were much exaggerated, as were her damage claims. Now life can get good again for the Osteens.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Thoughts on "unChristian"--Part 4

The next perception to consider is, “The church is anti-homosexual.” This is a complex perception/accusation, and even in trying to determine this, I would think that questions would have to be very carefully answered. In my own unscientific poll, I found that if I asked if the church is anti-homosexual, church people initially answered “yes,” but then wanted to clarify that they were against homosexuality as a sin, but that they did not mean that they hated or looked down upon those engaged in homosexuality. It is this “love the sinner, hate the sin” dichotomy that gets blurred in trying to discuss this issue.

In our larger culture, it is incredibly difficult to find a way to say that you believe that homosexuality is abnormal human behavior, and that it is morally unacceptable as well, without being branded “homophobic.” Since there is increasingly little room for this opinion, there is little hope that those outside the church will ever find that those who follow Jesus, believe the Bible, and take this view as anything less than bigoted.

Unfortunately, some believers have engaged in bigoted behavior toward those who practice homosexuality, have spoken disparagingly of these men and women, and generally failed to respond with the same kind of compassion and care that they would extend to sinners living moral lives but embracing cultic teaching, or sinners who choose immoral heterosexual sin as their vice of choice.

Believers rightly understand that some sins are more serious than others. For example, the warnings against heterosexual sexual sin outside of marriage in 1 Corinthians 6 (with a prostitute in that context) is said to be unique in its consequences from other sins. Similarly, homosexual sins recounted in Romans 1 are a unique degradation against one’s own humanity as a judgment brought upon mankind by God. All sin brings punishment and, ultimately, spiritual death. But some sins have even more dire consequences in this life.

This should not lead, though, to an attitude of superiority by believers toward those engaged in such sins. We should always be anti-sin. This may even mean opposing publicly those who promote their sins as right, good, and normal. But we are not anti-sinner, at least in the way that we are perceived to be.

Chapter 5 in unChristian wrestles with this issue, highlighting through data and anecdote the failures of the church. I am appalled by some of the stories they tell of Christian bad behavior toward gays and lesbians. Having had close friends who struggle within this lifestyle and culture, I know the challenge of showing love and concern while not expressing approval of choices. I agree that we can affect people in our lives, but I am not sure that the authors’ expressed hope that we can be perceived as loving and accepting of people regardless of lifestyle is possible on a large scale. No matter how much Christians can do individually and corporately to show love and acceptance, the cultural shaping of acceptance of gay and lesbian lifestyles and normal make us even more out of step with our neighbors than does our pro-life bent.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Thoughts on "unChristian"--Part 3

Is it true that “The church is too focused on converts”? Frankly, I wish we were much more focused on converts than we are. My personal concern as a pastor is that most of the Christians I know have little if any concern about seeing those non Christians around them become believers, other than their own children or close relatives. And in most cases, they would be happier if others would take care of making sure that these people become believers.

However, the authors of unChristian (in Chapter 4) find that that younger Americans outside the church believe we are more concerned about notching our witnessing guns than we are building lasting relationships with them. In their interviews they found that only a third thought that Christians expressing concern were sincere, but two thirds of Christians believe that others would perceive their intentions as sincere. While I could prove that these two numbers are not contradictory (there are fewer Christians than population, and it may well be the two thirds of Christians are those interacting with the one third of outsiders!), there are some important concerns raised here by the authors, and they have to do with how Christians evangelize.

The authors affirm something earlier data has shown—large scale evangelism events are not highly successful (at least in terms of long term results), and current non church culture shows no real receptivity to feeling as if a program is being carried out on it. And personal evangelism that shows no continuing interest in the person being approached is highly likely to fail. This should not surprise, nor should this be something that describes most Christian personal outreach. Large events may create interest that can be built upon, and “stranger evangelism” may sometimes pique curiosity, but usual evangelism should be personal and relational. Preaching the gospel to a crowd is biblical as modeled in Acts 2, but when unbelievers were under conviction there, they had the chance to express repentance and be baptized—meaning people were interacting with them on some more personal level.

The chapter also speaks of the difference between conversion as a moment vs. conversion as a process. The authors rightly point out some of the faulty thinking and practices in methods that only aim for a moment’s action, without thought about the rest of life. They also highlight that Christian living is a lifelong process of sanctification in relationship/community. One need not embrace this thinking and give up a passion to see lives changed.

This chapter should encourage believers to consider how they witness, but I don’t think it should cause individuals or churches to be any less zealous to see people “get saved.”

Rejoicing through tears.


Our family knows both real hope and real grief much more personally, as this past week saw the promotion to glory of my mother-in-law (and in love), Beverly Haddock. I've just returned from being with my wife's family for the memorial services and time together, thus my absence from this and other normal activities. We rejoice that she is with the Lord, but the hole her departure leaves is painful to us all. The verse she chose for her memorial was characteristic of her life--Galatians 5:6b--"What matters is faith demonstrated in love."


Beverly lived an exemplary faith; one that has been passed on to her children and grandchildren. Her memory-making skills were the stuff of legend--every thing became more of an "event" because of her plans. Her compassion for others seemed to have no limits, although she sometimes did express impatience with those who just would not accept help and counsel. She was much more charitable in her opinions and evaluations than me, and I would like to think that she helped take some of the more pointy and prickly parts off of me.


So much was said by others in the services that spoke to my heart; and I had the chance to say my piece as well, but I don't think I can adequately express just how remarkable she was to us, and how much we have lost in her departure. On Saturday, she asked me to pray for her to know whether to stop her chemo treatments, which seemed to be draining her of what little life she had. The next Wednesday, she told the doctors that she had decided to forgo more treatments. Hospice came on Thursday, but the angels came on Monday. She was in some pain and her loving husband and partner of half a century, Hal, was holding her in his arms while on the bed next to her and praying for her as she slipped from Hal's arms to Jesus's.


The Lord loves his children, and loves to take them home--even though he knows it causes us pain. It can only mean that his love is so much better and his presence so much grander that in weighing our pain and his children's joy, he can only choose that which is best and most in tune with his loving, holy nature--and so he allows us the refinement of grief even as he dazzles Beverly with glory.

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Thoughts on "UnChristian"--Part 2

(I realized that I had to use this title, rather than "unChristian Thoughts"--wouldn't want to confuse anyone.)

Let's think about the first broad category/assumption made about the church by outsiders, according to the book: The church is hypocritical. Instead, the authors argue we should work to see this perception become "The church/a Christian promotes transparency and a change in actions before words."

Who would argue with the fact that the latter is a desirable goal among Christians? Not me! And the authors present lots of findings backing earlier studies that show the younger Christian generations are shot through with inconsistent behavior patterns. The statistics are depressing, as they have been ever since Josh McDowell did something similar a decade or two ago. Christians talk about morality but engage in immoral behaviors with staggering frequency.

Some of this behavior is hypocrisy, some of it is not. If I say I do one thing but do another and pretend that I don't, I am a hypocrite. If I say I do or should do something, do another, admit it and repent, I am not a hypocrite, I am a redeemed sinner. So let's not link failure automatically with hypocrisy.

That said, there are a lot of hypocrites in the church--in fact, most of us deal with trying to appear better than we are. It is not a church trait, it is a human one that is one of many sins that derive from pride. Each of us may be transparent about some failures (the safe ones, like wanting things we don't have, or lack of patience) and protective about others (lusts, ambitions) that are not as easily admitted by all. We fear what people will think of our failures, and we hide them, or think we do. Only when the community life within the church is convincingly safe might these barriers begin to come down.

This is a huge pastoral issue, but it is not the focus of the bad perception we are discussing. The perception is that Christians call others to standards that they refuse to live by themselves. Is this the case? And even if it is not, will those outside get it?

Do non church people understand fallenness, dealing with indwelling sin, the continued battle that rages within believers to walk in holiness? Do they understand that when we forgive blatant sinners who repent we are expressing grace--even if it is the seventy seventh time? Is it hypocritical to teach against divorce, then deal with divorce in your midst in a grace-directed way? Is it hypocritical to teach that God can deliver from substance abuse, but have recovery groups in the church that include people who fall?

Often when those who don't follow Jesus tell me that they can't stand the hypocrisy of the church, they are referencing well known televangelists I would not identify as part of the body, or people they know who go to church are are miserable neighbors or co-workers but loudly proclaim their faith. Both are problem situations that I think I can address to help my non Christian friend understand the difference between such people and what Jesus offers us when we are truly related to Him. I know, though, that these will be situations I'll see repeated. I think that has been the case since the first century. John had to deal with Diotrephes, a leader who magnified himself over the gospel. The Corinthian church had a few members who left unbelievers wondering what being a Christ follower was about when they were suing each other or when one was sleeping with his step mother.

I pray for a dearth of hypocrisy among God's people. And I long for greater transparency about our struggles and greater discernment in learning to demonstrate change as a basis of calling for it in others. This is not news that should shock us, but a situation that should remind us of what we are to be.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Thoughts on "UnChristian"--Part 1

David Kinnaman, president of the Barna Group, and Gabe Lyons, a church ministry professional, have done in depth research on the under 40 culture in America and discovered that those outside the faith see the church as unChristian--hiding rather than demonstrating the reality of Jesus Christ to those who need him. Their book has generated quite a bit of discussion around me, and so I've decided to interact with its basic contents.

Kinnaman and Lyons love Jesus, and they want the church to do better. They are convinced from their experiences and from the data that, on the whole, the church has portrayed wrong messages to the culture, messages that Busters and Mosaics (the generations behind the Boomers) have believed about evangelicals to the point that the large majority have no interest in what we say.

The authors isolate 6 major beliefs about the church that need changing. After introducing their concerns and general findings, they use these six concepts as the meat of the book's analysis--both what is wrong, and what needs to change. The six messages that need changing are:

1. The church is hypocritical--we say one thing and do another. Outsiders are "skeptical of our morally superior attitudes...conveying a polished image that is not accurate (29)."

2. The church is too focused on getting converts. People are targets for evangelism, but not valued otherwise.

3. The church is antihomosexual. Christians are "bigoted and show disdain for gays and lesbians (29)."

4. The church has been too sheltered from the larger culture, leaving us "old-fashioned, boring, and out of touch with reality," and we "do not respond to reality in appropriately complex ways, preferring simplistic solutions and answers (30)." Thus, we don't know how to respond to the messes in which people find themselves.

5. The church is too political. We are committed to a politically conservative agenda as right-wingers, identifying this agenda with our core values and message.

6. The church is judgmental, looking down on those who do not live as we believe, and not being honest about our attitudes. Outsiders doubt that we love people as we say we do.

In the early chapters where the methods and these six ideas are put forth, I found myself immediately "conflicted." I cannot deny that these six statements can be easily applied to various parts of the broad category of ministries that would be called "evangelical." I've encountered all six in my experiences, and am probably guilty of more than half of them at some time or another.

Is this new "news" however? Haven't professing followers of Jesus always been a bit of a mixed bag? Further, haven't those outside often misunderstood even the God-honoring characteristics of the church, let alone not understood our continuing failures on the road toward being like Jesus? As the authors presented anecdotal evidence that supported their findings, there were moments when I cringed, knowing that a Christian could in fact do what had just been related. But then I would think of other Christians who might have done much better in the same situation--and maybe actually had done better.

The survey data was strong, and it clearly revealed the negative attitudes toward evangelicals. Interestingly, it had slightly better numbers for those considered "born again." And the authors said that they did not define either of those categories, allowing the respondents to define them for themselves. So, those outside of the church were asked to use their own understanding of evangelicals and "born agains" in answering questions. I wonder where those concepts of who we are came from? Are they accurate? Might some people think negatively toward such "labels," but not necessarily apply it to a neighbor who is a real follower of Jesus and a very positive influence in their lives? I wonder.

I'm going to interact with the six ideas in future posts. I would suggest that the book is well worth reading, though. Maybe if you read it or have already done so, you might care to comment as we go along.

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

"Jesus in China"--a FRONTLINE/World report on PBS

This is a fascinating report on Christian faith in China. For those who read the book "The Heavenly Man," the house church leader whose wife was being prayed for in the first segment was one of the leaders mentioned in that book.

Monday, July 07, 2008

Two Great Articles on the Trinity

Every once in a while, I come across articles on basic truths of our faith that are great presentations worthy of review, or even saving for future reference. John Armstrong has written two excellent articles on the nature of God as a trinity. He gives the explanations of how this doctrine came to be expressed, and does so in ways that I think are helpful. The first article is here, and the second is here. If you want to understand the basic assertions of trinitarian thinking, why it is important, and why our creeds reflect it as they do, check these articles out.

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

If You Can Be Godly and Wrong, Does Truth Matter?

This is John Piper's latest post, and a very thought provoking article, especially for those of us who love doctrine.

The Apostle C. Peter Speaks


Charisma Magazine, not my favorite source of news or commentary, featured an article, Leaders Commission Todd Bentley at ‘Lakeland Outpouring’, in which C. Peter Wagner, longtime professor at Fuller Seminary, writer on church growth and missions, theological godfather of the Vineyard Movement, and now spokesman for a growing "apostolic" movement, led a group of fellow apostle/leaders in commissioning Todd Bentley as an "evangelist." This move was made because Bentley's ministry in Lakeland, FL, has been so unusual and uneven that charismatic and Pentecostal leaders there have been worried, with some publicly repudiating him. The step places Bentley under Wagner's apostolic authority and supposedly creates more accountability for what he teaches.

I only highlight this because of the sadness I feel over Wagner's self-description as an apostle and his authoritative pronouncements as an apostle in this situation. The fact that one of his companions was John Arnott, pastor of Airport Christian Fellowship (a church removed from the Vineyard fellowship and home of last decade's "barking" revival), confirms to me that Wagner's well meaning passion for seeing the Holy Spirit work has overtaken any sense of discernment he may have once possessed. I have always disagreed with Wagner's views on spiritual power, but I respected his scholarship and his earnestness for kingdom growth. Now I fear his valuable contributions are only past tense.

Tuesday, June 03, 2008

What to do with an extra $75 billion

The Copenhagen Consensus, a group of 50 economists, including 5 Nobel laureates, studied the major problems of the world to see how we could best use resources to help improve the lives of the world's people. The idea--if $75 billion were to be invested, what would the priorities be.

The answers were interesting. Global warming was not in the top ten. Three proposed solutions came in at the 14th, 29th and 30th in the top thirty cost effective solutions. Combating malnutrition among the 140 million children of Africa with vitamins would cost only $60 million, but would yield "benefits" in terms of reduced health care costs and other associated costs of this loss of over $1 billion. In fact five of the top ten solutions were related to malnutrition, one (immunization for children) had to do with disease, one had to do with increasing trade to help provide economic stability, and one was related to education. The results can be seen in full in this .pdf file. The next twenty were dominated by solutions related to dealing with diseases and water supply (6 of 10).

I have referenced this study before in a number of conversations, and impressed by the group's thinking(Link to site here). While not saying that global warming is a problem, the study's participants believe that seeking to implement most proposed solutions is prohibitively expensive, will yield less than significant results, and would take away the chance to deal with problems that are as devastating to people but are, in fact, treatable.

John Piper: "20 Reasons I Don't Take Potshots at Fundamentalists"

John Piper has a way of thinking that, in my humble opinion, both stimulates thought and provokes joy. He has done so again with this blog entry. For those too lazy to follow the above link to the original, here it is...enjoy! For the record, #1 isn't as true in my experience as his, but I'll grant that many do "fit." I especially appreciate #16 and #20!

20 Reasons Why I Don't Take Potshots at Fundamentalists

1. They are humble and respectful and courteous and even funny (the ones I've met).

2. They believe in truth.

3. They believe that truth really matters.

4. They believe that the Bible is true, all of it.

5. They know that the Bible calls for some kind of separation from the world.

6. They have backbone and are not prone to compromise principle.

7. They put obedience to Jesus above the approval of man (even though they fall short, like others).

8. They believe in hell and are loving enough to warn people about it.

9. They believe in heaven and sing about how good it will be to go there.

10. Their "social action" is helping the person next door (like Jesus), which doesn't usually get written up in the newspaper.

11. They tend to raise law-abiding, chaste children, in spite of the fact that Barna says evangelical kids in general don't have any better track record than non-Christians.

12. They resist trendiness.

13. They don’t think too much is gained by sounding hip.

14. They may not be hip, but they don’t go so far as to drive buggies or insist on typewriters.

15. They still sing hymns.

16. They are not breathless about being accepted in the scholarly guild.

17. They give some contemporary plausibility to New Testament claim that the church is the “pillar and bulwark of the truth.”

18. They are good for the rest of evangelicals because of all this.

19. My dad was one.

20. Everybody to my left thinks I am one. And there are a lot of people to my left.

Monday, June 02, 2008

Tom Peters: "Leadership is the Same in the 21st Century AD as it was in the 21st century BC."

Below is a video of Tom Peters on leadership's unchanging nature. I've enjoyed his writing in the past, and he makes a very interesting point about the nature of leadership.


Tom Peters on the Definition of Leadership from Tom Peters on Vimeo.

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Judson's Words to Missionary Candidates


John Piper's Desiring God Blog references this link to Adoniram Judson's words to potential missionaries, written after decades of service in Burma. Judson is considered the pioneering figure in the development of American missionary activities in the early 1800's. His powerful words are a challenge to our ways of thinking, and left me encouraged and challenged. Pay special attention to his fourth, sixth, seventh, and tenth points. Let me cite just part of the seventh:
"Seventhly. Beware of pride; not the pride of proud men, but the pride of humble men -- that secret pride which is apt to grow out of the consciousness that we are esteemed by the great and good. This pride sometimes eats out the vitals of religion before its existence is suspected. In order to check its operations, it may be well to remember how we appear in the sight of God, and how we should appear in the sight of our fellow-men, if all were known."

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

How Not to Speak to Memorial Day

In our services Sunday, we acknowledged the sacrifice of those who have died in service to our nation--the point of Memorial Day. Politicians took advantage of the day to speak as well. However, not all of them did well. This blog entry on Powerline shows the strange take of one of our presidential candidates, Barack Obama. It was not a good speech, in my view, and raises many of the questions I have about his ability to fill this role. At the end of the blog is a link to see the President's speech, which was actually quite eloquent and definitely non-partisan. Just to be fair, I plan to highlight positives and negatives as I see them from all sides in the future.

Just finished reading...


...Why We're Not Emergent (By Two Guys Who Should Be). This excellent little book is probably the best common language introduction to the whole issue of the emergent/emerging church that I have come across. The authors, Kevin DeYoung and Ted Kluck, are a pastor and parishioner from a URC church in East Lansing, Michigan, and approach the subject from a sympathetic yet biblical viewpoint. Their analysis benefits from significant quotations from key emergent thinkers, citations from other, deeper critics, and a genuinely humble acknowledgement that some of the problems with church as it has been as cited by emergent voices are real and need attention. As I read, I was grateful for the documentation of citations--so often I would want to either check in a source I had read and available, or wanted to note the source to see if what they shared was a fair representation of what was being said in the original. I believe that, on the whole, fairness prevailed. I might quibble that Donald Miller, especially in his book Searching for God Knows What backs away a bit from some of the extremes of Blue Like Jazz, and shouldn't be lumped in with other emergents, but what they said he said was true. I'm not emergent--I'm too old (unless I were a founder type like McLaren, or their favorite theologian like McKnight, or their favorite "futurist" like Sweet), don't wear the right glasses, and don't drink Guinness (or any beer for that matter!!!). Now DeYoung and Kluck have written a great volume that states the more substantial reasons I don't wear the label. If you have any desire to figure the question out for yourself, especially if you've read McLaren's books, any Doug Pagitt, or loved Blue Like Jazz and wonder what the fuss is about, read this book!

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Of course, you could try this

...in India.

Getting on a Japanese Train at Rush Hour

This is the kind of cultural experience you may want to forego.

Monday, May 12, 2008

A Psalm of Single-Mindedness

The following, by Joe Bayly, was read by Chuck Swindoll at Clyde Cook's memorial service, and I think it warrants our consideration.

A Psalm of Single-Mindedness

Lord of reality
make me real
not plastic
synthetic
pretend phony
an actor playing out his part
hypocrite.
I don't want
to keep a prayer list
but to pray
nor agonize to find Your will
but to obey
what I already know
to argue
theories of inspiration
but submit to Your Word.
I don't want
to explain the difference
between eros and philos
and agape
but to love.
I don't want
to sing as IF I mean it
I WANT TO MEAN IT.
I don't want
to tell it like it is
BUT TO BE IT
like YOU want it.
I don't want
to think another needs me
but I need him
else I'm not complete.
I don't want
to tell others HOW to do it
but to do it
to have to be always right
but to admit it WHEN I'm wrong.
I don't want to be a census taker
but an obstetrician
nor an involved person, a professional
BUT A FRIEND.
I don't want to be insensitive
but to hurt where other people hurt
nor to say I know HOW you feel
but to say GOD KNOWS
and I'll try
if you'll be patient with me
and meanwhile I'll be quiet.
I don't want to scorn the clichés of others but to mean everything I say including this!
from Joseph Bayly, PSALMS OF MY LIFE

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Ridiculous, but fun

OK, this is silly, but thought you'd like it--just get past the commentary in Japanese and watch!

Sunday, April 20, 2008

A great man finishes well...


Dr. Clyde Cook, beloved long time president of Biola University, passed away last week at his home in Fullerton, CA. After returning home from a speaking engagement, he died suddenly at home, leaving behind his wife Anna Belle, 2 children and their families, and a university family of thousands.
Clyde Cook was a man whose life exemplified service to Christ. His parents were missionaries in Hong Kong at the outbreak of World War II, and when captured by the Japanese, the family was split among three prison camps. After the war, the family was reunited, and Clyde later attended Biola College, where he excelled in basketball. He later became a missionary to the Philippines, a professor at Biola and Talbot Seminary, President of OC International, and then President of Biola. Taking over the school at a time of transition and decline, he stemmed that slide and saw the school more than double under his presidency. He carefully guarded Biola's faithfulness to its heritage, while moving the school forward academically and in its influence in both the Christian world and the marketplace. He retired to become President Emeritus just one year ago and saw his successor appointed just this past fall.

I was blessed to have Dr. Cook as President during my time at Talbot, and I had a great appreciation for his leadership and his heart. Those of us with a long enough memory to have seen what he led Biola through have a great appreciation for his faithful service. He has finished his work here well.

Travels and Treasures

This has been an interesting month for me. The week after Easter I traveled to Russia to teach in a Bible institute and learn more about the work of a missionary friend. Byron was my guide, which is fitting because he has also been a friend and someone whose life and ministry I have admired for years. It was an amazing experience, and one that I hope to have a chance to repeat. Perhaps I blog on it later--you can look at my picture feed for some highlights.

After returning home, I turned around the next week and flew with my wife to California to meet my first grandson! Yes, as young as I look in that picture, I am a grandpa--Again, the picture feed can allow you to share the joy!

Then I returned and have been digging out of the pile of things awaiting me, emails to answer, mail to deal with, papers to grade (lots of those), class materials and a final exam to prepare, and of course the normal preparations that each week of ministry brings. Through it all I find myself rejoicing--I can't believe I get to experience all the amazing opportunities and blessings that are around me.

Don't get me wrong. There's plenty of hardship that comes along, but I am at one of those points where I can assert the truth of the statement that our "light and temporary afflictions" cannot be compared with the eternal weight of the glory to come.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

A Wave of Muslim Conversions to Jesus Christ

Many saw the new this weekend that Pope Benedict XVI baptized into the Roman Catholic Church Italy's most prominent Muslim writer during his Easter mass. I am not a fan of Roman Catholic practices or dogmas, but that is amazing news, just the same.

What is important to note is that this is not just an isolated incident.

Increasingly, Muslims are questioning the tenets of their faith, and the practices carried on in its name. This has led many to look elsewhere for truth. Christianity, especially the biblical gospel, seems to be gaining hearers and followers in unprecedented numbers.

For a refreshing report on one way that God is doing His work in the Middle East read this article by Raymond Ibrahim, posted on National Review Online, about Father Zakaria Botros, an Egyptian Coptic cleric (whose own site has clear presentations of the gospel) whose TV show on a satellite channel is having remarkable influence throughout the Muslim world.

My friend, John Cook, tells me that in conversations with Iraqi pastors, the church there is exploding with growth through the conversion of Muslims.

Joel Rosenberg reports on Muslim conversions to Christianity as the untold story of the region and the decade.

Amazing stuff.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Let Judas Shake You

This is from John Piper on the Desiring God blog. Thought provoking as usual.

Hard Words on the Bush Presidency

While I am not certain I agree with all of this, David Frum's Diary on National Review Online gives a critical, and I fear all too accurate evaluation of the Bush presidency's inability to pick and manage the right team of leaders.

And near the end of this article by Michael Barone, the same theme appears--the President has been too willing to let others go too far down their own paths, to allow his own subordinates to undercut his policies, and to let others choose his military leaders without exercising a president's authority to question them.

Shelby Steele on Barack Obama

In an article entitled, "The Obama Bargain" in the Wall Street Journal, Shelby Steele, an incredible writer (who happens to be black) offers his insightful critique on the role of race in the success, thus far, of Senator Obama's candidacy, and the danger to it of the revelations about Obama's church.

Make no mistake. Rev. Wright (Obama's pastor) is no evangelical, nor is his church one that is in any way amenable to the biblical gospel. Whether Senator Obama is himself a true follower of Jesus cannot be known by his belonging to this church.

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

'Gilligan's' Mary Ann caught with dope - Yahoo! News

Mary Ann, say it ain't so!

Gilligan had a drug history as well, or at least Bob Denver did, before his death in 2005.

At least the Skipper and Mr. & Mrs. Howell didn't live to see this day! What does Ginger think? Will the Professor offer an anti-drug invention made of coconuts and bamboo?

Monday, March 10, 2008

Southern Baptists Fight Climate Change (AP)

Don't worry, they still fight against drinking and gambling, too, but a group of SBC leaders, including its president, have now weighed in against global warming. You can find the AP's news report here.

Now, I'll probably get abuse on for this, but having actually watched Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth," and then read many of the critiques of both it and the global climate change theory in general, I tend to think that there may be at least some prudence in considering whether substantially increasing carbon dioxide levels due to the use of fossil fuels might have an impact on our atmosphere and thus on ocean temperatures, ice caps, etc. (just go back and read all the qualifiers in that sentence!). I'm not embracing the theory, or rejecting it as more liberal lunacy. I don't see how the Kyoto Treaty, which exempted the nations who were doing the worst at curbing emissions from its restrictions, would do any good. And I am proud that the U.S. actually leads in the development of the technology and implementation to reduce such emissions.

All that said, I'm wondering just why we needed church leaders to weigh in on the subject--as church leaders . It is not a moral question, nor is it one that offers clear moral solutions. Nor one that the church needs to give "top down" guidance to people about--although as the article points out, "no one speaks on behalf of all Southern Baptists (no truer words were ever written!). Many cite "creation care" as the mandate under which such guidance should be offered, but one man's or nation's idea of care may end another's livelihood.

This is a time when speaking up as a concerned citizen is absolutely appropriate, but to do so displaying the label of "pastor" or "denominational leader" seems an attempt to transfer credibility, as if one is saying, "I'm an expert in soul care, so listen to me about climate change." I've just told you that I have some concerns about what we should do related to this issue, and you know I am a pastor, but that does not mean I am an expert, nor someone whose word should carry more weight because I have advanced degrees in theology and watch the news.

Equal Time for Rome

OK, I gave the Church of England's leader a reprimand here a few weeks back--I haven't heard from him, but I am sure he is still grieving.

Now, let me turn my attention to the Vatican, and its list of "new sins," including pollution according to a spokesman for the Holy See. Are there new sins, in the sense of violations of God's Word? Probably not. There can be new ways to manifest old sins, and I think that is what is being discussed here in rather incautious terms.

Thursday, March 06, 2008

Muhammad and Man at Harvard

Reading Michael Graham's article in the Boston Herald will let you see how things have come full circle at the institution founded by believers to train ministers for New England's churches. Yes, I know that this is old news, but what is even more interesting is that the new policy betrays Harvard's later commitment to a thorough going liberal openness. Here is the gist of the article.


Six times a week, Harvard kicks all the guys out of the Quadrangle Recreational Athletic Center at the request of the Harvard Islamic Society. This is to accommodate those female Muslim students whose faith won’t let them work out in front of men.
In the old days, Harvard would have laughed if some Catholic or evangelical mother urged “girls-only” campus workouts in the name of modesty. Today, Harvard happily implements Sharia swim times in the name of Mohammed.
At Harvard, that’s called progress.
When I asked Harvard spokesman Bob Mitchell about this new Sharia-friendly policy, he denied that they were banning anyone. “No, no,” he told me, “we’re permitting women to work out in an environment that accommodates their religion.”
By banning all men from the facility, right?
“It’s not ‘banning,’ ” he insisted. “We’re allowing, we’re accommodating people.”


I am not against men's and women's times in various facilities, but when the only reason for the accommodation is a religious preference, that seems, well, less than liberal!

Saturday, February 23, 2008

And now for something completely the same...

We paid tribute to Bach, now here is a unique rendition of Mozart!

Bach's "Air", Bottled Version

Enjoy the following tribute to Bach, played in a most unusual manner.

Friday, February 08, 2008

A Pragmatic Reasion I'm Glad Not to be Anglican...

In (this article, we hear the Archbishop of Canterbury offering the opinion that sharia law should be used among Great Britain's Muslim population to govern civil matters to which it speaks. He suggests that since Orthodox Jews have similar rights, it is time for Muslims to have the same.

Now, I don't know how true it is that Orthodox Jews can let their law supercede British law, but I also don't know that Orthodox legal opinions are quite as all encompassing as Muslim sharia law. And what makes things "civil" matters in one person's understanding may be radicially different in another's view.

I don't think episcopacy is a good idea theologically, but Rowan Williams makes quite a practical argument against it in my view, too. He has not been a great advocate for evangelical thinking (an understatement), and why he would feel compelled to promote Islamic law in a country whose monarch is still head of the church there is confusing.

Monday, January 28, 2008

The Rise of the "Child Man"

In a lengthy article (caution: the article has a few references that are off color) in City Journal, Kay Hymnowitz discusses the full flowering of the post-adolescent SYM (single young male). It isn't pretty. Whether calling it the "Peter Pan syndrome," delayed adulthood, extended adolescence, or the "odyssey years," all trends point to young men wishing to remain boys when it comes to responsibility even while they have the freedoms of adulthood.

Consider the following tidbits.
  • According to Nielsen Media, over 48% of males 18-34 year olds regularly play console video games, with the average time spent on them being 2 hours and 43 minutes a day. That is more time than 12-17 year olds spend. This age group is the number one consumer for video games.
  • Only 33% of 25 year olds are married, and only 58% of 30 year olds are married--both the lowest reported percentages ever in America. The median age of marriage for men rose from 26.8 to 27.5 in less than six years--a statistically large societal movement in such a short time. This is most significant when it is also reported that the largest single factor in boys becoming men is marriage and family.
  • Data also indicates that the majority in this demographic do not consider cohabitation as a step toward marriage, but rather a chance to receive the benefits of a wife without assuming the responsibilities of a husband (no real news there).
  • The average SYM is 26, single, lives either with parents or buddies in an apartment, and spend large amounts of money on themselves that would have, in the previous generation, been spent on a mortgage and on family concerns. This makes them a prime target for advertisers. They love Spike TV, Comedy Central, and Maxim magazine. Favorite actors are "Adam Sandler, Jim Carrey, and the 'Frat Pack,' as USA Today dubbed the group of young male comedians that includes Will Ferrell, Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn, Owen and Luke Wilson, Jack Black, and Steve Carell."
  • Cartoon Network boasts a significant SYM audience for its "Adult Swim," featuring such shows as Family Guy and Futurama. Advertisers know this, which is why Saab, Apple Computer, and Taco Bell are major advertisers.

At an age when their parents were building homes and families, and their grandfathers had saved the world from Hitler, these guys are mastering Halo 3.

Women of the world--be careful! Fathers of daughters, beware! And followers of Jesus, let's make sure we address the fact that God offers a radically different view of masculinity and manhood that in infinitely more rewarding, significant, and joy filled.