Best concept: Our ability to accept others ("table fellowship" in Jesus' time) often breaks down along purity lines. The Pharisees attitude was, "We're clean, and if you are clean, then you can eat with us." The driving question was "Are you clean?" Jesus' attitude was, "Come and eat with me no matter what, and the fellowship can cleanse you." Jesus' driving question was "Are you hungry?"
As you can see from my links list, I have read his blog with interest, in large part because so many see him as a representative of the "good" end of emergent thinking. Overall, there was not much about his presentation today that sounded uniquely "emergent." One bone I would pick, though, was his use of a few illustrations that seemed to undermine any sense that convictions on any issues was a good thing. Twice, he expressed what he identified as difficult situations or questions where answers or understanding seem beyond easy response. One was a girl struggling with whether or not to drive her friend to an abortion clinic, after not being able to dissuade her from pursuing abortion. The other was wondering why a pastor would struggle with the someone's lesbian friend who loved Jesus. In both cases, I sat there saying, "these are real and messy questions, but there are clear answers to be given in both cases." It almost seemed as if there was a sense that having answers and ministering within community were not compatible.
Were these examples meant to prove messiness or to suggest that we have no clear answers to give? I don't know, and it may be that my antennae are too sensitive about such things, but since there was no opportunity for me to ask that question, I'm left wondering. But I'm grateful to have heard McKnight in person, and was encouraged to think by what he shared.
1 comment:
Great thoughts, Craig. I posted my "comment" on my own blog to save your space. :-)
Post a Comment