The CyberParsonage

Moving Next Door

2011-01-20T16:38:00.000-05:00

I've reached the point where 2 blogs is redundant, but I like Blogger better than WordPress. So, I've moved both of my blogs to a new address in the Blogger world. Visit the new "The Village Pastor" website for future posts. If you subscribe to this feed, I invite you to switch to the new site as well.

Happy Epiphany!

2011-01-06T10:57:00.000-05:00

OK, most of you didn't even know that it was Epiphany, let alone were celebrating it. That's fine, since most of us didn't grow up following the traditional church calendar. But this was a celebration of the manifestation of Jesus as the Son of God in the world. In the western (Roman) tradition, from which Protestantism sprang, it commemorates the coming of the wise men--which supports my contention that the wise men were not at the birth! Gentiles from a faraway land came and announced just who this child was to those in Israel who had ears to hear. In the eastern (Byzantine, or Orthodox) tradition, it is a general celebration of all the ways Jesus was manifested as God in the flesh (they call it "theophany"--God manifestation). This includes the birth, the Magi's visit, and Jesus' baptism by John.

What was the point of this celebration? The fact that God's redemption plan was NOT some sort of secret wisdom hidden from view, but that it was manifested. Paul spoke of this in his "mystery" references (remember Ephesians 3:1-13)--God's plan of redemption hinted at in ages past now revealed in Christ Jesus. He was to be a light dawning on the people walking in darkness (look up Isaiah 9:1-7).

If Advent begins the story with anticipation and waiting, and Christmas tells us the promise is fulfilled, then Epiphany becomes the unfolding of this promised light--the beginnings of the ministry of Jesus preaching the gospel of repentance.

John's introduction of his Gospel speaks of this powerfully:

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life and the life was the light of men. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overcome it... (vv. 1-5)

The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world. (v. 9)

And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth. (v. 14)

May your Epiphany day, and every day be one where the light of Christ shines to you, in you, and through you!

Benjamin Zander: Classical music with shining eyes

2010-12-16T15:06:00.000-05:00

This is a remarkable video, not just in terms of gaining an appreciation for classical information, but for the leadership lessons the artist teaches. It's long, but worth it. Someone shared it with me on Facebook, and I wanted to share it with others.

Would you like fries with your Hallelujah Chorus?

2010-12-07T16:16:00.000-05:00

This has been around for a while, but for those who haven't seen it, you should. A "flash mob" breaks out in a sterling rendition of the Hallelujah Chorus in a mall food court last month.

Watching it makes me wish that those of us who know the Messiah would be as bold as those who are singing "The Messiah" in this clip.

Enjoy.

Carson's "The God Who is There" Audio/Video Available for Free

2010-12-02T10:25:00.000-05:00

This is a great book, by a wonderful teacher, and now we get to see the 14 part series done at Bethlehem Baptist Church in 2009 upon which the book is based. Here is the first episode, and if you follow the links at the bottom, you can find the next 13 episodes as well as links to supporting materials for use in small group study. I highly recommend this to you.

The God Who Is There - Part 1. The God Who Made Everything from The Gospel Coalition on Vimeo.

55 Years Ago Today: Rosa Parks Refuses to Move and Sparks a Movement – Justin Taylor

2010-12-01T15:16:00.000-05:00

Read this wonderful tribute from Justin Taylor at his "Between Two Worlds" Blog.

Click here.

Happy Thanksgiving to Anyone Checking This Long Silent Blog!

2010-11-25T09:21:00.000-05:00

Keeping 2 blogs, Twitter, and Facebook going hasn't worked too well for me--this is the site that has suffered, even though it's much easier to edit than my other blog, The Village Pastor (my official blog for my church family).

But if you are here, which may mean you have a very boring Thanksgiving Day going, I do want to wish you a Happy Thanksgiving Day. I have so much for which I am thankful!

I can never be thankful enough for the mercy and grace of God, given to me freely through Jesus Christ, and experienced more and more through the work of the Holy Spirit. As I set my affections on things above, I am immeasurably blessed and changed. So much could be said, but I'll move into preaching unless I stop.
My wife and best friend, Kathy, has blessed me throughout the years in so many ways. Her love and support give me the confidence to seek to be the man she sees in me. I never want to take for granted such a great wife.
My family teaches me so much, from the power (and sometimes pain) of love, to the marvel of God's work in each of us, to discovering the wisdom we never know our parents had, to having our siblings become more to us than we would have known, to the miracle of watching children become "people" (you know what I mean). I love you all.
The body of Christ amazes me. My local fellowship, Grace in Cedarville, loves me so well. I love you back. Dear brothers and sisters who serve with me here, and serve for us around the world have enriched my life even as they model selfless service to the Lord; you are in my heart and prayers, and I think about you with gratitude.
I have some very incredible friends, whose impact on my life far exceeds the time we sometimes get to spend together. Just hearing your voices on the phone, or getting a random email, gives me so much joy.
I don't want to be trapped by what I have, but I also want to express great thankfulness for the ways in which God has blessed us with a bounty! We will eat some of that bounty today!

So thankful!

Blog Entering the Cone of Silence

2010-09-13T21:11:00.002-04:00

As I am traveling to southern Africa for two and half weeks, and will not have steady access or time to blog, I'm letting anyone who cares know that the blog will be pretty much limited to the thingys in the sidebar. Enjoy, and Lord willing I'll be back here in early October!

Joel Rosenberg's latest report from Israel

2010-09-08T14:11:00.000-04:00

Click on the title above or the link below to read Joel Rosenberg's insightful take on the situation currently in the Middle East. I usually find myself nodding in agreement with most of his points. This article is no exception.

Click here to go to the article.

Why A Pastor and Church Burning the Quran is a Sin

2010-09-08T11:23:00.000-04:00

I am appalled by the plans of the Florida church and minister to burn Qurans on September 11th. But it is not just the stupidity of the action and the callous disregard of a myriad of unintended consequences that may occur (from danger to Americans overseas to inciting greater Muslim fanaticism around the world) that bothers me.

I believe this action is sin. By doing what they are doing this pastor and congregation are offending the very people they would teach Jesus died for. The pastor has forfeited his calling as a testimony to God's grace and his leading his people to live out the gospel toward others. The people have joined in the evil that their leader plans to do. This is not loving one's neighbor, turning the other cheek, going the extra mile, giving no offense, or making the gospel an aroma of life. Not only would Jesus NOT do this, but it flies in the face of living as gospel witnesses. But then, I am not convinced that the gospel matters very much in this case, at least in the interviews I hear from the pastor. He complains about Muslim extremists and their actions, and actually said, "What are we supposed to do, sit back and take it?"

Yes, sir, we are, if we are ambassadors for Christ.

If this man were acting as a private citizen as a part of a secular fringe group, I would still be appalled and in opposition. But he is doing this while calling himself a pastor--a shepherd of God's flock. And this church is calling itself a manifestation of the body of Christ. By their words and actions, neither could be judged to be true.

They bring reproach not just on Americans, but on Jesus Christ and the gospel, just as Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church has done for years during their protests at military funerals and their anti-homosexual protests calling for the deaths of "queers."

We cannot stop people from using titles or callling themselves churches. But we ought to make clear that they are at the very best deluded and deceived, and very possibly they are false teachers and false witnesses used by Satan himself to undermine the gospel of Jesus.

Here is a recent news story on the event: Fla. minister: Sept. 11 Quran burn still planned - Yahoo! News

Stephen Hawking: God didn't create universe - CNN.com; God: Yes I did - Bible

2010-09-02T16:42:00.000-04:00

The faith expressed by Stephen Hawking is breathtaking: "spontaneous creation" as the reason everything exists. The "existence of gravity" as evidence that the universe "can and will (note the future tense)" create itself from nothing.

How can "nothing" create itself?

I have great respect for this man's courage and discipline to overcome incredible disabilities. Yet, if he does not qualify as an example of "professing [himself] to be wise, [he] became fool[ish]" in Romans 1, I would be hard pressed to be able to cite anyone as such an example.

Read: Stephen Hawking: God didn't create universe - CNN.com

Why Hope is Missing for Today's Israel/Palestine Negotiations

2010-09-02T10:21:00.000-04:00

Last night the President hosted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas for dinner. Today they start what is supposed to be a year's worth of negotiations to finalize peace between these peoples.

Can I suggest one very big reason that there is little reason to hope here? There is no leader of "Palestine" to negotiate with. Abbas and what is left of the PLO governs the West Bank, shakily. Hamas has held Gaza for years and no "government" presence exists there. Quite simply, Abbas can't implement anything he agrees to. And even in the West Bank, Hamas operates, as they proved in an attack on Israeli settlers that killed four. Abbas' government has received billions from Europe and the U.S. to prop it up, and relies (as does Gaza) on Israel to continue to supply power and water (the fact that Israel keeps the power on in Gaza while rockets continue to be launched from there against her is one of the most underreported stories of our age).

Unless and until Palestinians have a functioning leadership that actually has control within its territory, the only negotiating "option" for Israel is to make concessions and hope that this time everyone else will "play nice." Yasser Arafat was the last such leader, and he turned down offers more generous than those recently discussed. Abbas says more concessions from Israel must be made, but he can not offer any guarantee that Hamas will abide by his agreements--in fact, they have said they will not.

I pray for the peace of Jerusalem, knowing that ultimately it will only come with the return of her Messiah. Until then, I pray for the peoples of the land, even in the midst of the continuing loss of political hope. May they discover the hope that brings true peace--the gospel of peace.

When a Plan Fails, Is the Solution to Do it Again?

2010-09-02T09:50:00.000-04:00

A departing Obama administration economic advisor who helped craft the stimulus package announced in her last speech that the plan failed to generate growth and jobs. Her suggested solution is to do it again. In fact, it is to "tax less and spend more."

Now, if government deficits and debt are bad and drag down our economic performance and confidence, it would seem that we should spend less or tax more, but not the other way around. And if, as has been shown from the time of Kennedy onward, tax rates are reduced, then government revenues actually increase because people have more to invest and spend, then taxing more should be off the table. Therefore, the solution is to spend less--much less.

I know, I don't have advanced degrees in economics. But I did read Henry Hazlitt's Economics in One Lesson and listened well to Dr. Allen Monroe in Foundations of Social Science class. Why, if uncontrolled debt is bad for me and spending more than I take in is devastating, should I believe it is good for a society?

Read the speech and commentary here: Romer: My Plan Failed FrumForum

"Back To School" from Walter Russell Mead's Blog

2010-09-01T13:21:00.000-04:00

This link takes you to the thoughts of a brilliant scholar and writer who is returning to the classroom and has some powerful advice for students. It's a thought-provoking read.

Do We Have To Say "in Jesus' name" to Pray Right?

2010-08-11T19:40:00.000-04:00

In a recent sermon I mentioned that repeating words as if they make our prayers effective is a practice similar to the Ephesians' attempts to use words of power as charms or curses. Some dear friends pointed me to John 14:14 where Jesus encourages us to pray "in my name" as warrant for saying this is necessary. I spent some time composing an answer, and here is what I shared with them.

Thank you for your comment and response last Sunday. I hope that you will believe me when I say that I appreciate your concern for honoring the name of Jesus in prayer, which I referenced a few weeks ago in the sermon. I’d like to try to explain what I was referring to, and hope it will help you to understand my thinking on this matter. I know that it may seem that I am moving outside of what Scripture directs, such as John 14:13-14, 15:16, or 16:23-26. As you say, the Savior clearly teaches us to ask the Father “in my name.” I believe that is what we are to do. But I do not believe that what this means is simply to say the phrase at the end of, or sometime in the middle of, any given prayer. The point I was trying to make is that simply saying, “…in Jesus’ name” is not what praying in Jesus’ name means, and can become similar to what the Ephesians thought of as using words of power to get what they wanted if we reduce it to saying the right phrase at the end of a prayer.

As I examine the prayers prayed from the time of Jesus onward in the New Testament, I do not find any particular formula at the end of a prayer. If you look through the New Testament, you do have prayers that have “Amen” at the end by various apostles and writers. You have prayers that simply end with the final petition or praise to God. But you never find an example of a prayer that ends with the phrase, “in Jesus’ name.”

In Matthew 18:20, Jesus speaks of gathering “in my name” which means he is the focus or reason for the gathering. Matthew 24:5 tells of false prophets coming “in my name”—claiming the authority and commission of Jesus. In Mark 9:37 it speaks of receiving a child in Jesus’ name and receiving Jesus himself by doing so. In Mark 9:39 it speaks of doing a mighty work in his name. This means claiming to act in the authority and power of Jesus or on behalf of Jesus. In John 5:43, Jesus speaks of coming in “his Father’s name”—which means on behalf of or in the authority of the Father. He says that people didn’t receive him this way, but that if someone comes in his own name, the listeners would receive such a witness. Then there are the passages in John about prayer that I mentioned above. In each case, it does not mean to say the words, “in Jesus’ name.” I don’t, for example, say “I receive this child in Jesus’ name,” or “I do this good work in Jesus’ name,” and so on. I do these things in the attitude of doing what Jesus would do or have me do in the given situation.

Based on all these usages of the phrase, and the absence of the words themselves in actual New Testament prayers, it seems that asking or praying “in Jesus’ name” cannot mean I am to say those words, any more than receiving a child in Jesus’ name means I have to say those words then. I pray in Jesus’ name whenever I pray in under his authority, or pray what he would have me to pray. When he teaches us to pray in the Lord’s prayer, he does not tell us to say “in Jesus’ name” at the end, but he teaches to pray exactly what he prayed for in other prayers and would have us pray for—the glory of God, the will of God to be done, the provision of God for our needs, the protection of God from evil. Such prayers carry his authority because they are what he wants us to pray—so that when I pray such things I pray in his name. This would hold true for all the prayers I find written in the New Testament. I believe that Paul’s prayers in his epistles were certainly prayed in the power and authority of Jesus, but he didn’t say or write, “in Jesus’ name” at the end. He didn’t need to because the whole of the prayer was what Jesus wanted him to pray.

Now, it is certainly not wrong to say “in Jesus’ name,” and if it is a meaningful reminder of the authority in which we pray, it is a very good thing. I often speak of Jesus’ name and authority as I pray to the Father, during the course of different prayers. However, it seems to me that many times the use of “in Jesus’ name” has become an empty form to us, much like the word “Amen.” We treat these phrases as our way to say either “goodbye” or “I’m finished now,” in a prayer. But Jesus’ name is his authority and his reputation, and “Amen” is the word for “true,” as in “truly, truly I say to you.” It means you can believe what is said.

Worse, there are some who actually believe and teach that unless we say these words, our prayers are substandard and not likely to be heard. I have had people here tell me that this is what they had been taught. That is not only wrong, but dangerous, because it makes a particular word or phrase the key to powerful praying. And of course we all know that there are prayers for things offered with the “in Jesus’ name, Amen” ending that are not according to the will of God—sometimes out of ignorance, but sometimes out of wrong motives.

I grieve over the lack of powerful, consistent prayer that marks so many Christians and churches. I long to see prayer revitalized in a way not seen in decades among American Christians, and we will be talking about prayer in a few weeks for a number of Sundays. One of the problems I encounter is believers who have lost faith in the power of prayer, and one of the main reasons I hear from them is “well, I prayed with all my heart, and prayed in Jesus’ name, but it didn’t happen. Jesus said if I ask for anything in his name that it would happen. So he is either not really able to do it, or praying in his name doesn’t work.” I think a wrong understanding of what praying in Jesus’ name means needs to be corrected for many. It isn’t saying the words, it is praying as Jesus wants us to pray—for the right things, with the right motivation, for the appropriate length of time. It is not to inform him of what we need—for he knows, but to demonstrate faith and dependence on him alone.

I'd be glad to hear your thoughts on this, and if you can offer any help to my understanding, I would gladly receive it. I love you and appreciate your fellowship in the gospel here. You have been a great encouragement to me as your pastor. Keep praying for me.

So do you have any thoughts to share on this?

A Great Resource for Audiobooks!

2010-08-10T15:13:00.000-04:00

I have been enjoying the benefits of registration with ChristianAudio.com, a site that boasts "the largest collection of Christian audio books" on the internet. They indeed have a large catalog, and their prices are reasonable.

But even better, they offer a free audiobook each month, and sometimes more than one. I am currently listening to one I got a few months ago, The Cost of Discipleship by Bonhoeffer. I've also obtained both of Francis Chan's books on audio, Religion Saves: And Nine Other Misconceptions by Mark Driscoll, The Divine Comedy by Dante Alighieri, a biography of E.M. Bounds, and others.

Just click on the link above and register if you would like to begin to share the bounty of books on your IPod or mp3 player.

What do Francis Chan, Jim Belcher, and N.T. Wright all have in common?

2010-08-10T15:07:00.000-04:00

Answer: They have all resigned a pastoral role in order to pursue a new direction in ministry, AND, I read a book by all three this year and found it helpful!

Francis Chan's book was Crazy Love. An excellent and convicting call to a life that is sold out for Jesus. Actually I've read two books by Chan, the other great one being Forgotten God: Reversing Our Tragic Neglect of the Holy Spirit. Neither is ponderous, and both are challenging reading. Chan has left his teaching pastor position at Cornerstone Church of Simi Valley, CA, to serve a ministry in Thailand with his family for the remainder of the year, and then find a new ministry in a major urban area in the U.S.

From Jim Belcher, Deep Church: A Third Way Beyond Emerging and Traditional. Most books that try to come up with a "third way" tend to get lost, but this one strikes a very good balance. I'd say that the middle that is described wouldn't bother too many of us. Belcher has left the PCA church he planted in southern California to study abroad for a year.

Finally, N.T. Wright's "Paul for Everyone" commentary series has a wonderful volume on The Prison Epistles that has been particularly helpful in my preaching through the book. I also read his tome on The Resurrection and the Son of God and, while huge and hugely technical, found it very helpful nonetheless. Wright is stepping down from his role as a Bishop in the Anglican Church to take up teaching in a university.

Follow the links if you are interested.

Getting Back on the Blogging Bus

2010-08-08T17:18:00.002-04:00

Well, I don't know if any one has missed me, but the summer has been one of lots of activities and travel, and not one for sitting and writing. At least, that's my story. I'm working on a few posts right now, and hope to get back to this soon.

We'll see!

Update on Caner post from 5/3

2010-06-29T11:07:00.000-04:00

Ergun Caner, dean of Liberty University, has been demoted from that position, and will serve only as a professor at the graduate school he has led for four years. The action was taken following an investigation prompted in large part by bloggers who saw discrepancies between his public statements concerning his background as a former Muslim.

You can read a report on the action and the reasons here.

This whole situation was originally referenced and continues to be a good warning to those of us who speak publicly to keep our tendency toward embellishment and self-promotion firmly under the guard of the Holy Spirit.

Does Israel Deserve the World's Condemnation?

2010-06-02T21:55:00.000-04:00

The world seems ready once again to condemn Israel for the force used to stop a flotilla of activists seeking to break the blockade of the Gaza strip. This blockade, imposed by both Israel and Egypt, is meant to stop the supply of weapons and other war-making material to Hamas, the de facto rulers of this small, densely populated strip of land along the Mediterranean. Over 10,000 tons of relief aid is shipped through Israel to Gaza each week, so the aid on the ships was a pretext for the attempt to break the blockade. People on the ship were prepared to use violence to repel Israeli forces that sought to board the main ship, with a result of at least nine of the activists dying in the clash.

Video has been released showing the soldiers being attacked by the ship's passengers, and both Egypt and Israel offered to let the ships dock and then transport the aid to Gaza. These offers were refused. The only conclusion to draw is that the flotilla wanted a confrontation. One woman on the ship was quoted saying that they had two good alternatives ahead--landing in Gaza or martyrdom.

In a clear and blunt video message in response to worldwide criticism, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu refuses to apologize for actions he says are defending the safety of Israelis. He warns that Israel will continue to maintain this blockade, and asks other world leaders, "what would you do" if your people were under missile attacks.

Some press in the U.S. is reporting Israel's responses, but most of the world's reporting is calling the action a massacre and calling for condemnation of Israel. While I don't believe that all of Israel's actions in relation to Palestinians are always just; in this case I have no doubt that Israel's actions should be seen as justifiable, and in fact would be the actions of any country that considered itself at risk. When America blockaded Cuba during the missile crisis in the early 60s, there was no thought that any ship would be let through, no matter how "peace loving" they may have been.

Israel is under siege in world opinion, and is still bordered by nations and peoples that desire and seek its destruction. I've been in Israel during tense times, and in cities that have been the target of missiles from Lebanon and from Gaza. Their treatment of Gaza is far more humane than that of their neighbors dealing with political rivals or ethnic groups. How much humanitarian aid would be making its way to a surrounded Jewish enclave that was surrounded by a superior Arab power? There is no doubt that the amount would be zero--if such an enclave were even to be allowed to exist.

Israel's future holds some very difficult days ahead, until the day they welcome their Messiah's return to earth. Her friends will be few in those days, but God does not forget those who bless his chosen people, even in their unbelief. Being a friend to Israel may sometimes mean expressing disapproval when the state acts unjustly. More often, it will mean enduring the opposition of most of the rest of the world.

Alcohol, Liberty, and Legalism – Justin Taylor

2010-05-18T11:04:00.000-04:00

I had just had a discussion with someone about a pet peeve of mine--dealing with the twin problems of some Christians trying to insist that alcohol is a sin, and having to listen to other Christians who have discovered their freedom to enjoy alcohol--and have to talk about it in every conversation (or tweet, or FB post, or blog). And then I came across this post by Justin Taylor at his Between Two Worlds blog, and not only found him talking about the same thing, but writing a post that captured my thinking, and encouraged me as well. I highly commend it to all.
For the article, click on the post title above, or follow this link.

Posted using ShareThis

A Story I Want to Remember

2010-05-17T22:47:00.000-04:00

Today was the funeral of a man in my church that many people would not know--Carl's years of more visible involvement were before my tenure. Even so, many knew him, and those who had known him well over the 20 plus years he was in our village knew he was special. We heard the story of Carl's conversion today, and stories about the change that faith brought into his life. He became passionate to let people know about Jesus, and he loved to find ways to help and give to others. He welcomed me to town when I moved here with one of his favorite passions and gifts--good coffee beans! One story, though, stands out in my mind.

One of our missionaries returned home for a year of furlough. Reporting to the church, the missionary shared a prayer request that the Lord might provide a vehicle for the family to use for the year. Carl responded after the service, telling the missionary that because he recently purchased a new car and had two vehicles, he could give the missionary one to use. Indeed Carl had a brand new Chrysler that was to replace an old clunker he had driven for years. The next day, the missionary came to Carl's home to get the car, and was surprised when Carl handed him the keys--to the new Chrysler. Carl kept driving the old car for the year. As I spoke to people, I discovered that this was not out of character for him--it was normal. The few who knew about this at the time were profoundly affected by his example. I was today.

FOXNews.com - Has Noah's Ark Been Found on Turkish Mountaintop?

2010-05-03T17:12:00.000-04:00

My friend Taylor Minor told me about this story last week, but I haven't commented on it yet. It is quite interesting, and I'm intrigued.This link takes you there.

Bloggers Target Seminary President--Christianity Today reports

2010-05-03T16:57:00.002-04:00

I take this story to heart as a possible warning against embellishing my own story for the sake of "the bigger story." I have personally appreciated a number of times that I have heard Ergun Caner speak. I also can appreciate how one's remarks could either a) be embellished in the retelling, or b) be easily taken by others out of context as embellishment. Follow this link for the story.

Posted using ShareThis

OT Scholar's Views on Evolution Cost Him His Job

2010-04-09T20:55:00.000-04:00

USA TODAY reports that Bruce Waltke, one of the best known evangelical OT scholars of our day, resigned his position at Reformed Theological Seminary, following a controversy begun by his statements, recorded on a website video, affirming that one could believe in evolution and also hold to the inerrancy of Scripture. His comments caused a furor at the Seminary, which allows diversity in views of creation, but doesn't allow faculty to hold a Darwinian position.

The report linked above doesn't explicitly state that Waltke believes in evolution, but he did say that if the church resists established scientific data, it is denying truth, which is God's truth. The report also quotes Scot McKnight expressing dismay over RTS's actions and affirming the need to wrestle with the questions Waltke raised. The interim president of RTS responded that the confessional nature of the institution must provide a boundary within which faculty must function.

I have benefited greatly from Dr. Waltke's ministry--both preaching (he is an excellent speaker) and writing. At the same time, I am puzzled at this development in his thinking--he has been such a stalwart for treating the content of the OT with such integrity. If he has embraced a theistic evolutionary view instead of some form of direct creation, I am disappointed. I can understand thinking that looks at the framework of Genesis 1-2 as other than a literal 24 hour day structure--my own view. The old earth of Hugh Ross and the "day-age" views that are similar are full of problems, from my perspective, but still affirm direct creation by God. But Waltke seems to be allowing for (if not endorsing) a position I see as inconsistent with the high view of Scripture he has always defended.

Waltke's remarks were in a video posted by an organization called BioLogos, that seeks to promote what they call the harmonization of science and faith, which for them seems to be the acceptance of evolution within Christian thinking. Waltke was speaking to a seminar they hosted. Once the controversy began, Waltke asked the video to be removed, but the damage was done. I am not only bothered by Waltke's position, but that as a professor at RTS, he would publicly advocate a position that was out of line with the institution that employed him. If his views had changed, he should have left before creating such an uncomfortable situation for RTS. He should have known better, and done better for a school that had good to him.

In other "creation news" I found out that R. C. Sproul, who did not believe in recent creation, changed his views after hearing Douglas Kelly's presentation, now in the book Creation and Change. It is primarily a theological approach, with reference to science. I've gone through it myself and recommend it if you are interested.

Posted using ShareThis

Ambivalence About the Evangelical Left

2010-04-08T19:03:00.001-04:00

I do not like having biblical faith linked to a political agenda, and believe that much damage has been done over the years by having evangelical leaders play too prominent a role in political settings and debates that go beyond their biblical moorings. Having Christian groups talk about the "Christian position" on the issue of tax rates, or gun ownership, or drilling for oil on Federal lands, for example, seems a stretch. There certainly are Christian principles that apply in all decision-making, but whether we have an income tax or national sales tax isn't a matter of moral absolutes (as I understand it).

That said, I have grown increasingly troubled by a number of trends among those who are broadly identified with the "evangelical left"--left being liberal politically and, to some extent, theologically. Jim Wallis, Tony Campolo, and Ron Sider have been recognized leaders of the politically active evangelical left for years, and some of the famous "emergent" names have been the theological anchors of the movement more recently--Brian McLaren, for example. I have personally heard the first three speak on more than one occasion, and have appreciated their presentations. I've read McLaren and found his early works thought-provoking, but his newer ones disturbing.

While my own political views have been developed out of what I hope is biblical thinking, I confess that my conclusions tend toward a more conservative/"libertarian with Christian restraints" approach to the tasks of governments, placing the role of social improvement clearly on the shoulders of the Church--recognizing our failures, but pointing to our history of successes at least as bright as government efforts have been. Nevertheless, I recognize that my own thinking is not infallible, and seek to see the wisdom in thinking different from my own, and allow it to help me grow in my understanding and perspective.

I readily grant that Wallis, Sider, et.al., love the Lord Jesus Christ and do what they do from pure motives. However, statements they make and positions they take, coupled with their silence and lack of action on other issues, lead me to my current sense of unease with their movement. I run the risk of overstatement, but let me give you some examples of why I have problems with their thinking.

1. They seek to broaden the "gospel" to include more than the term means. I hear calls for us to include envirnomental stewardship, racial reconciliation, alleviating poverty, and ending wars as "the gospel" and I cringe. These may all be fruits of the gospel, but they are not the gospel. I read an essay on racial reconciliation that said that it was "the heart of the gospel" and spoke disparagingly of any thought that could conceive of the gospel in other terms. I am passionate about racial reconciliation as a necessary product of the embrace of the gospel, but it is not the gospel or its heart. The heart of the gospel is "God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life" (John 3;16. The content of the gospel is "Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures, and he was buried; and he rose again according to the Scriptures, and he was seen..." (1 Cor. 15:3-4). The call of the gospel is "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved" (Acts 16:31).

The gospel is preached to the poor, but it is not about being poor. It is not, "God has designed government to provide you with what you need." It is not even, "A nation where Christians shape policy must take care of you." It is the message of transforming grace experienced through repentance and faith in Jesus Christ. The resulting changed life may change a person to the point that circumstances change. It brings the power of God to bear in the believer's circumstances. And it brings the believer into the family of God, where he should (and often will) find the support structures that have been missing in his life through the incarnational ministry of the church.

The gospel has a context (creation and the history of redemption). The gospel has fruit (community, stewardships exercised, grace and mercy modeled, and yes, justice sought for the oppressed, in the name of Jesus). But the gospel is a message that is succinct and clear and defined in the Bible.

2. The Evangelical Left will make strong pronouncements on the necessity of dealing with poverty, opposing war, improving housing standards, mandating diversity, etc., while refusing to speak with equal force and time against abortion, against homosexual practice, against attempts to expand the definition of marriage beyond a heterosexual, monogamous, union, and other at least equally important biblical issues that have an impact on the culture. Why choose one set of biblical values at the expense of another? Isn't that what they accuse the Evangelical Right of doing?

I have a confession. I've voted for a liberal Democrat before. While in California, I was faced with voting for a pro-choice conservative Republican, and a lifelong, committed pro-life liberal Democrat. The Democrat would raise my taxes. He would favor more government regulations on things I don't think need to be regulated. But every time the issue of abortion came up, he did everything he could to oppose funding, or limit abortion availability. He made his own party mad on the issue repeatedly. It wasn't even hard to choose. My tax rate isn't a matter of biblical absolute. Killing infants in their mother's wombs is sin, and should be considered immoral as well as being illegal.

If I felt that the Evangelical Left was as concerned on the issue of abortion as they are housing policy, I would be much more at ease with their passion. I'm not convinced, though.

3. Why does their theological pursuit always seem to lead them away from clear commitment to a biblical gospel, scriptural authority, and historic orthodoxy? A couple of examples:

Shane Claiborne has an amazing testimony of commitment to the poor and to living out his faith in community. I admire his faith. He is my brother. Yet in his book, The Irreisistible Revolution, he cites his mentor, Tony Campolo, for challenging him as to whether, if there were no heaven or hell, he would follow Jesus for the joy he brings now. Claiborne says he has reached that point and is happy about it (p. 117). I read that and wondered how he could be more spiritual than the apostle Paul, who said that if in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are the most pitiful fools on the planet (1 Cor. 15:19). We can only have hope now in Christ because he has changed us by his grace through his death and resurrection, which is all about a life beyond this one. It includes this one, but points toward the next.
Brian McLaren was on NPR last week and said that he was taught a view that God was in Heaven wanting blood and Jesus had to die to satisfy that desire. Now, he understands that Jesus's death on the cross was orchestrated to have God identify with victims instead of the powerful who persecute them. This rejection of atonement is a further step away from orthodox Christian belief and teaching from the Scripture. If "it pleased the LORD to bruise him" (Isa. 53:10) it would seem that God the Father orchestrates the death of his Son. If there is no remission of sin without the shedding of blood (Heb. 9:22), it would follow that God, in fact, did desire the blood of Jesus to be an atoning sacrifice for sin and a propitiation for sinners.
Traditional evangelicals are accused by some on of the Evangelical Left of being so focused on getting people to Heaven we forget to care about them now. May I ask some of my "EL" friends, do they believe any of their neighbors are in danger of going to Hell? Do they ever preach on the dangers of eternal punishment to be avoided. Do they call the poor to repentance, or just the rich? Why is gospel proclamation in the historic sense missing from their efforts, their manifestos, and their campaigns? Wasn't it traditional evangelicals who founded rescue missions as well as foreign missionary societies? General William Booth and the Salvation Army would not fit any left/emergent model. What efforts are being undertaken systematically by those of the Evangelical Left to see people go to Heaven and not go to Hell? Or have they given up on Hell as a reality? Is Hell only bad housing here? Is it being too poor to buy health insurance? As Jesus said to the Pharisees in their neglect of the weightier matters of the Law while keeping secondary matters, perhaps we all should have done both. It is a false dichotomy to say we must choose one over the other, but if the choice must be made between a homeless person being offered an eternal home and forgiveness or a comfortable temporal home without God, I know what must prevail.

I believe that most on the Evangelical Left are sincere, and have genuine faith in Christ. Many seem to be those who have done a pendulum swing away from conservative, orthodox roots due to the failings they have seen in that end of the evangelical spectrum. But their "gospel" seems distant from the message of Jesus--not the whole and holistic ministry of Jesus, but the message of Jesus. Their priorities seem as "this-worldly" as they accuse the Evangelical Right of being "other-worldly." Their political alliances are at least as compromising of their foundational values as those on the Right. And their theological shifts don't always seem to stop on this side of orthodox faith--the faith once delivered for the saints.

Inside Jokes for Believers: Review of "Stuff Christians Like"

2010-04-07T09:46:00.000-04:00

Jonathan Acuff is a church insider--a pastor's kid who saw all the good, the bad, and the truly strange aspects of conservative Christian culture growing up, and continues to observe it today from the vantage point of a believer who hasn't let Christian weirdness drive him away from the faith. He has blogged about these various evangelical practices, behaviors, and idiosyncracies at Stuff Christians Like and now has collected some of his essays into a book by the same name. You can read it, or listen to a free download availalble at ChristianAudio.com.

I read the book, and found many of Acuff's stories amusing, and not a few of them just a bit painful, as his observations prove both true and embarrassing in terms of how the evangelical subculture functions. From repetitive words in prayer to singles praying Jesus doesn't come until they get married and have sex, most everything he writes rings true.

Acuff uses his insights to make points, and he does so without lots of anger or vitriol--using well placed sarcasm instead. He isn't heavyhanded in his applications when he makes them, either. He clearly loves the church in all her weirdness.

As with any such book, there is unevenness to the quality of the essays and insights. While some demanded I read them carefully to enjoy them fully, others, seemed like "skim quick" material. The book, and the website, are lighthearted and good relaxation material.

Great Insight from Tim Keller on Proverbs

2010-03-17T08:04:00.003-04:00

This post from Tim Keller, Pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in NYC, was an encouragement to my heart this morning because of its fresh insights from an old favorite--Proverbs 3.

Posted using ShareThis

Archaeologist sees proof for Bible in ancient wall - Yahoo! News

2010-02-24T07:58:00.000-05:00

This story (link from title or below) has been out for a few days, but I waited to post on it because I wanted to see if anyone came out contradicting it. I didn't expect so, since Eilat Mazar, the archaeologist heading this work, is very well respected.
Of course, we who believe the Bible aren't surprised to find evidence that Solomon really lived, built up and expanded city walls in Jerusalem, and did so in the time frame of Scripture. But it's nice for those who have less faith to be reminded of this history.

There is, as the article notes, a "minimalist" school in Israeli archaeology that late dates all Hebrew history and thinks anything before the divided kingdom period is pretty much myth. This group has spent years arguing against the reliability of the biblical record for the first half of Jewish history, but this is another significant argument against their view.

Archaeologist sees proof for Bible in ancient wall - Yahoo! News

Some thoughts on "Deep Church"

2010-01-31T06:13:00.002-05:00

Deep Church is Jim Belcher's engaging contribution to the seemingly endless attempt to understand what emergent and emerging churches are about, the differences and conflicts that exist between that stream and "traditional" churches, and the quest to find a middle way that takes the best of the two. I listened to the audiobook, and now will get the written version so that I can mark it more carefully, but I was impressed by a number of points that I would share.

Belcher writes out of experience and personal quest. His own frustrations with some of the limitations experienced in his traditional church experience led to rethinking of the nature and ministry of the church, and in the process he was able to engage key thinkers in what was then a new, emerging movement. He also had opportunity to dialog with key leaders and observers in evangelicalism who helped him along the way. Thus the book flows well out of his own journey.
He also writes out of personal concern as a church planting pastor to get it right. As a former church planter, I know firsthand the joys and challenges of trying to make sure that that church becomes what God wants it to be, not what I've experienced in the past--sometimes those are very different birds!
He gives some of the best insights into the nature of what he identifies as three streams of "emerging" churches, values their thinking, and takes seriously their concerns. He also presents traditional counter-arguments to emerging thinking. At a few points I felt that there were better spokesmen and thinking for "traditionalists" than were cited, but overall his portrayal was fair.
His idea of the "deep church" as a middle way was intriguing and inviting. I think all of us pastors believe we are doing "deep church," but his concept was different than most--a scripturally anchored fellowship that also draws on the "great tradition" of the ecumenical councils as a helpful (though not equally authoritative) source for keeping the church focused on the most important elements of faith.
I appreciated his emphasis on the need for a thorough going ecclesiology--a doctrine of the church that is robust and has confessional, community, and missional elements in balance. His praise of denominations as a means of accountability and support for churches may be surprising to some, but not to those of us who have experienced good denominational support in the past.
I'm not sure that his middle way is truly "middle." He clearly presents the questions of the emerging church movement, but the postmodern strength of questioning does not possess an equal basis for answering. His own position seems to be a blend of traditional theology and thinking with the most conservative stream of emerging church "retooling." It would be hard to be "non-traditional" in the larger sense when you are in a confessional denomination, value ecumenical creeds, practice church discipline, and so on, as Belcher does. So, while I greatly appreciate the book and the concept, it isn't in the middle, but still closer to one side than the other of the spectrum.

Read, or listen, to Deep Church, and you will hear a good story, receive an excellent primer on emergent vs. traditional thinking, and gain a well-reasoned vision for what the church can and should strive to be.

Security Questions, Strange Answers

2009-12-27T11:35:00.003-05:00

As I read this article on responses to the recent attempted terror attack on the flight to Detroit, I find myself bothered by a few matters.

One, this attacker had been turned away from Britain, reported to our embassy in Nigeria, and highlighted as a threat for nearly 2 years before this. So, we had warning about the person that was credible, but no action was taken.

Two, he had the same explosive on his body that the "shoe bomber," Richard Reid, used. That means either we have not found a way of finding such explosives when on the body short of a vigorous body search, or our system failed in Nigeria and Amsterdam, where he went through security.

Three, while it was alert passengers who subdued the would-be bomber (same as what happened with the shoe bomber), our proposed solution is to make all passengers remain seated with nothing on their laps for the last hour of flying. How would this have made the bomber's flight safer? The bomb was strapped on his body--his carry-on was cleared. I have a flight coming up in a few weeks. If security is tighter while getting on the plane, fine. But unless we are supposed to sit for an hour before landing staring at our flying companions to see if there is anything suspicious they do, I cannot imagine that taking away our pillows or laptops will make us safer. It will only prompt discomfort and the occasional subduing of a passenger with an itchy chest who is mistaken by someone in his row for a threat.

Interestingly enough, since 9/11, passengers have been alert enough to stop the only two attackers who have made it on the plane. Screening may need to be improved, and the questions of more stringent "no fly" lists and the use of profiling to increase security (let's not go through the whole "we have to treat grannies in wheelchairs just like young men from Yemen" argument again)must be addressed. But creating a flying environment that is even more uncomfortable seems like we're trying to tell people that "everything is under control" when it's not, and we all know it.

Finally, I'm bothered by the articles that quote FBI and other law enforcement saying that they are operating on the assumption he was "acting alone." The man was trained in Yemen, on a watch list, and said he was operating in conjunction with Al Qaeda. How in the world can this be "acting alone?" The same was said about the shoe bomber and the Ft. Hood shooter. Then we find out that each has been in touch with Al Qaeda types, have been encouraged or assisted by them, etc. This is not a criminal activity. It is terrorists waging war with individual agents. If we treat this phenomena as if it is crazed individuals alone, and not a larger attempt to attack the nation, we will face another 9/11 and then wonder how it could have happened. Get the military involved; increase the presence of armed sky marshals. And call it "war," not "crime fighting."

Ten Stupid Things That Keep Churches from Growing.

2009-12-22T12:39:00.002-05:00

This article is from a site I've discovered and like a lot--it's called Stuff Christians Like and offers an insightful look at our subculture. When I say "insightful" I sometimes mean "painful," because much that we have developed looks pretty lame when looked at more closely.

Anyway, you can take a look and see what you think. The article is an introduction to a book by church planter Geoff Surratt, and had some good insights that aren't even from the book. And once there, you can scan some of the other articles that are there, too.

Posted using ShareThis

"Tiger Woods, meet A.C. Green" (from LATimes.com)

2009-12-22T09:35:00.004-05:00

I really appreciated this article, by LA Times columnist Chris Erskine, for a number of reasons. First, I was, and am, a Lakers' fan, and remember the "Showtime" years with A.C. Green so clearly. Second, I'm a big A.C. Green fan--his talent was overshadowed by that of his teammates, but he made them better and was really good himself. Finally, he was and continues to be a consistent testimony, to the point that he continues to get a hearing from those who might not be prone to listen to his message from others.

Posted using ShareThis

A Brief Review: "Just Courage" Just Misses

2009-12-10T08:35:00.004-05:00

I decided to listen to the audiobook of Gary Haugen's Just Courage after hearing his message at The Master's College on a podcast--it was very good. I've followed the work of International Justice Mission, and have read many positive reports on their work. [Full disclosure: I actually met Gary when he was still a student at Harvard--his brother was living with me at the time--but we've had no contact since.]

As I listened, I recognized that Haugen is a good storyteller; his illustrations were engaging and certainly helped make his points. He is a thoughtful Christian who has seen an evil in this world that has become his passion, and he has lived out his concern through directing IJM in its work around the world. His thrust in this book was straightforward--just as the calling of Christians down through the ages has been to act with courage in overcoming the cultural evils of the day (African slavery, poverty, etc.), the call today is to seek justice, and specifically in the freeing of those sold into slavery (most often as laborers in factories or into the sex trade)and protection of the oppressed. This calling requires facing fear and danger, but this is why faith-inspired courage is necessary.

His passion and commitment to his cause his clear, and he believes that it's neglect cannot go on. He acknowledges that not everyone is called to this ministry, but presses a strong case that it must be embraced by all.

I applaud this concern and am thankful for the ministry of IJM. I praise God that our church is actively involved in a similar ministry that rescues and helps those enslaved in sex trafficking. A number of our members have traveled to Thailand to participate firsthand, and we will continue to increase our involvement in fighting this evil and bringing hope with the Gospel. It is the right thing for us to do in the name of Jesus.

That is the point at which the book left me with a question. I didn't hear much about the tie between the activity of setting captives free and an equal concern for seeing them set free from spiritual bondage. It may happen, and IJM may in fact be passionate about this, but it didn't come through clearly as I was listening to the book. There were appeals to the gospels concerning how believers were to live, and appropriate applications of that to seeking justice. But I didn't catch a direct link between seeking justice and freedom for slaves and bringing the gospel to recently freed but spiritually enslaved people. This has been the hallmark of Christian endeavors around the world throughout history. While Christians have often had their failures come back to haunt them, the successes of bringing the gospel and cultural change are most significant.

A related concern was a passage where Haugen argued that some are called to medical mission, some to alleviating poverty, some to evangelism and discipleship, and some to seeking justice (there may have been others in that list, but it was that kind of list, with those kind of elements). What bothered me a bit was the separation of evangelism and discipleship from the other activities. I don't think that evangelism is special activity that servants of Jesus can choose to do in the world, or choose instead to do justice ministry or poverty relief. And the servant of Jesus who chooses the others and leaves evangelism out of the picture because it isn't his calling is not acting faithfully in such a context, either. I'm not referring to preaching services, and there is plenty of need for culturally sensitive witnesses who may "go slow" to gain a hearing. But my resistance goes up when I see a dichotomy created where there should not be one.

Finally, I had the thought as I went through the book that if it were a person with a passion to feed the hungry, or end poverty, or provide medical care to those without, it would sound the same. Change the illustrations slightly and any "cause" could use this script. Again, that is not to say it isn't well written or a good cause; these causes, though, are ancillary to the great cause, however, of bringing God glory by leading the nations to worship Him. We bring good because we also bring the gospel. A story about a reunited family that gives no indication that they have even been exposed to the good news about Jesus doesn't inspire me. I'm guessing that they have been, but it's only a guess at this point.

Just Courage presents the argument for Christians to engage in the fight against the evils sin has brought into our world--in this case the injustices of slavery and oppression. It is a valid argument, but one that would resonate more strongly if it were more clearly anchored in a holistic approach that brings the opportunity for spiritual as well as physical freedom.

Reflections on Facing Life-Altering Surgery

2009-12-04T12:23:00.003-05:00

Matt Chandler, pastor of The Village in Highland Village, TX, is in surgery right now to remove a mass from his brain's right frontal lobe. The mass was discovered when Matt collapsed and was taken to the hospital on Thanksgiving.

I have a great appreciation for Matt's ministry--not just to the masses like me through his preaching and podcasts, but because he is my brother's family's pastor. My appreciation continues as I read his blog from this morning, "My Heart is full…I am Thankful" on the church's website. Read it and be encouraged. Then pray for Matt, his family, his church, and his ministry.

Posted using ShareThis

Tiger's Transgressions

2009-12-02T14:57:00.003-05:00

We've been inundated with the fast developing story of Tiger Woods' car accident and the follow up revelations of accusations that have, apparently, been substantiated concerning his unfaithfulness to his wife and family.

In a statement today, Tiger expressed sorrow over his "transgressions"--not a word you hear in popular culture. He says he has discussed them with his family, and that he hopes to do better in the future. He doesn't actually say what the transgressions are, and continues to assert his right to have a measure of privacy, even as someone who has earned his living as a very public figure.

I don't like the way he has been treated--especially that the National Enquirer and US Weekly have been leading the charge in printing accusations of immorality. I'm torn between two competing thoughts: the idea that those who use celebrity to enrich themselves must be ready to have the spotlight also reveal what is embarrassing, and the thought that I want his family to survive and the best place for healing for this family is outside the spotlight. The question of the the people's "right to know" is not easy to resolve.

What intrigues me is the word Tiger chose to describe what he did--transgression. It is more than a mistake. It is more than an error in judgment. It is violation of a moral law; one of the synonyms for "sin." And while I don't know if Tiger has any faith to speak of, I pray that he would not lose this sense of sin, of conviction, of failure--not just getting caught, but doing wrong. And I pray that such a sense will be the first step in his discovery of God's solution to both the guilt he feels and the evil he has done to himself and others--the mercy and grace and forgiveness to be found only in Jesus Christ.

A Not-so-normal Dinner Conversation on Contextualization in Mission

2009-12-01T22:26:00.004-05:00

Recently we had dinner at our home with long-term workers in a limited access country of central Asia. As we talked about the ministry in their setting, the conversation turned to the growing emphasis on "contextualization" in missions--the belief that success in penetrating Muslim and other strongly resistant cultures with the Gospel will involve allowing the creation of culturally appropriate forms of faith. Hence, "Jesus followers" may choose to create "Jesus mosques" in Islamic settings, choose to pray 5 times a day toward Jerusalem, choose not to call themselves "Christian," and in all other ways adhere as closely to the outward practices of Islam (this is a VERY abbreviated description of what is a complex approach).

While I have always felt that the church will look different in many ways in different cultures, I have been more uncomfortable with a contextualization that opts not only to be an "insider movement," but to be something other than a manifestation of the church that is linked to historic Christianity.

The husband/dinner guest became very animated in discussing this. He argued that in the areas of his world where the gospel is spreading most rapidly, there is not only an identifiable church in distinction to the majority culture, but the church is ready and willing to suffer for its open identity with and loyalty to Jesus. He says that the lack of an identifiable, visible church throughout his host nation's history has been a detriment to gospel witness, and that a heavily contextualized approach would continue that deficit.

Over two millennia, reception of the gospel and the establishment of the church has brought drastic change to cultures wherever it has gone. Western culture itself went from tribal violence to something very different. Look, for example, at the impact of the gospel on the Vikings: they gave up their violent ways and became a farming people. Yes, some elements have remained and been "redeemed," but core practices of other religions have not found a welcome in church life generally among evangelicals, and we have rightly labeled past Roman Catholic attempts to do so among tribal groups as "syncretistic."

Any thoughts?

Review of Donald Miller's "A Million Miles in a Thousand Years"

2009-12-01T22:00:00.004-05:00

I read and reviewed Donald Miller's latest book. You can find the review on my other blog--follow this link.

The Ultimate New Christian Fiction Best-Seller

2009-11-23T10:33:00.003-05:00

Tim Challies, a well respected Christian blogger, came up with what was the funniest idea and the best laugh I had last week: I share it with you here:

The Ultimate Christian Novel

Posted using ShareThis

The Manhattan Declaration: A Must Read for Concerned Christians

2009-11-23T10:11:00.004-05:00

The Manhattan Declaration, released last Friday, is a major statement of concern on three issues that unite professing Christians across a wide spectrum. That spectrum is made obvious when you see the signatories include Dr. Albert Mohler of Southern Seminary, James Dobson of Focus on the Family, and Ron Sider of Evangelicals for Social Actions, as well as Roman Catholic and Eastern Othodox representatives.

The three issues of concern are the sanctity of human life, the institution of traditional marriage, and the preservation of religious liberty--including the right to follow one's convictions on moral matters in spite of societal pressures against those convictions.

I would encourage you to read the statement, and I commend those who have drafted it and made it public.

You can follow this link to read the statement and see the original signatories.

Posted using ShareThis

George Whitefield Comments on Jonathan Edwards’ Family Life (Lex Loizides' Blog)

2009-11-16T10:16:00.002-05:00

Found this great article on the homelife of Jonathan Edwards, America's greatest preacher/theologian, observed by George Whitefield, the great preacher of the First Great Awakening. Good reading, and the blog looks good, too.

Posted using ShareThis

A Strange Way to Return After an Absence

2009-10-31T08:51:00.001-04:00

OK, I've been out of the country for a few weeks, as my Twitter feed has indicated, and been up to my eyeballs (as a dear mentor used to always say) in other stuff, so blogging has been a rare feat here. But I came across this survey, had a good laugh, and thought I'd share it with you on this Reformation Day!

You’re St. Melito of Sardis

You have a great love of history and liturgy. You’re attached to the traditions of the ancients, yet you recognize that the old world — great as it was — is passing away. You are loyal to the customs of your family, though you do not hesitate to call family members to account for their sins.

Find out which Church Father you are at The Way of the Fathers!

Ed Stetzer on Missional Churches' Lack of Missions Passion

2009-09-30T12:02:00.003-04:00

Ed Stetzer is an incredibly valuable resource to the Church today. His passions for helping revitalize churches and for global missions make much that he writes essential reading. So when I saw his article entitled, Five Reasons Missional Churches Don't Do Global Missions-- and How to Fix It, I had to read it.

You see, I want us to be missional in focus--realizing that every aspect of our lives is to be purposefully engaged for God's glory and gospel penetration of the culture around us. I also want us to see global missions as the task before us as a church. Using both terms--missional and missions--is not always fashionable, but I believe both are important. This article was a great read, and I commend it to anyone who wants a quick introduction to the problem that has plagued many who emphasize missional church life--the loss of zeal for reaching the peoples of the world.

Posted using ShareThis

Rob Bell's redefinition of ‘evangelical.' What do you think?

2009-09-29T18:09:00.004-04:00

Rob Bell's interview with the Boston Globe during his current speaking tour (it is short; read it here) is rather disturbing, not just in what it includes, but what it leaves out. In the interview, he expressly repudiates efforts to convert others and only embraces the term "evangelical" if it involves environmental issues and poverty; Jesus and the gospel are not mentioned.

We often find evangelicals not caring enough about the pain and injustice in this world, but the solution is not to ignore the coming of the new heavens and earth, the judgment to be faced before then, the necessity of the coming of Jesus to change things, and the clear warning of the Bible that not everyone will enter that blessed state. Perhaps there is much more that Bell said that was not recorded, but this interview as presented is very disturbing. I hope Rob will issue a clarification and expansion.

Oh, and by the way, I came up the same way he did, but it didn't feel nearly as bad as he seems to feel about it. Perhaps my calling really is more akin to performance art than preaching, but I'm not convinced yet (read the article to see what I'm referring to).

I want to believe that Bell is being outrageous for effect, but I can't tell if he is, or if it is something more.

Posted using ShareThis

Ignatius the Ultimate Youth Pastor

2009-09-24T09:28:00.001-04:00

This has been around for a while, but it is both funny and a bit too realistic, unfortunately.

Amazing Video--Did You Know 4.0

2009-09-22T15:14:00.002-04:00

This is pretty thought-provoking stuff! (ht Jeff Mooney @ www.socaltheologica.com )

Thought Provoking Article on American Health Care

2009-09-05T22:01:00.003-04:00

David Goldhill's How American Health Care Killed My Father in The Atlantic magazine is an article that highlights some of the reasons we are having a health care debate.

Posted using ShareThis

Publishers Announce End of TNIV; overhaul of NIV

2009-09-01T14:49:00.003-04:00

Christianity Today's Liveblog site has an article entitled, Correcting the 'Mistakes' of TNIV, Translators Will Overhaul NIV.

This is a major development that indicates the widespread dissatisfaction with the TNIV as a replacement for the NIV. Much of that dissatisfaction comes from significant stylistic changes, the most notable being "gender inclusive" language in many places (though never in reference to God). This change caused many conservative evangelicals to move away from the NIV, and may account for at least some of the popularity of the more recent ESV.

Posted using ShareThis

A good dramatized bio of C.S. Lewis

2009-08-31T10:51:00.003-04:00

This link will take you to a BBC produced dramatized biography of C.S. Lewis. It is well done and faithful to his story.

Posted using ShareThis

Tears of the Saints

2009-08-29T12:38:00.002-04:00

This video reminds us all of the task before followers of Jesus.

Edward Kennedy: Heb. 9:27

2009-08-26T16:32:00.003-04:00

Born into a family long on ambition and supplied with the money and power to fulfill it, Edward Kennedy might have been just another rich socialite had not his oldest brother died as a pilot in World War 2. Joseph Kennedy's untimely death meant the plans of his own father, Joseph, Sr., to make him the first Irish Catholic President had to be transferred to his second son, John. And when Senator John Kennedy became President Kennedy, and his younger brother Bobby became Attorney General, there was the matter of an open Senate seat in Massachusetts. Enter Edward "Ted" Kennedy, barely old enough to hold the office, as a candidate in the 1962 special election to fill the seat. Thus began a long, illustrious, and checkered political career that only ended in death. He was the second longest currently serving Senator, but his own actions ultimately kept him from the prize he had hoped to claim--the Presidency.

As a politician, he had few equals, acquiring power over time that made him a formidable enemy as well as a desirable ally. He led the campaign that stopped the nomination of Robert Bork to the U.S. Supreme Court and forever changed the confirmation process--many say for the worse. His 1964 immigration bill changed the way in which people were admitted to the U.S. It opened the door to a flood of people from poorer lands who prior to this did not qualify for entry, something that was both eminently compassionate and enormously aided his own political party. He moved his party ever leftward, arguing for federal power to be increased in education, economics, and most obviously, health care.

His personal problems never stayed personal, but he often managed to escape their normal consequences. The infamous drowning death of Mary Jo Kopechne, a young worker for his late brother Bobby's presidential campaign, stands as the prime example. He had taken her from a party after drinking heavily, drove off the road and into the water, left her to die, and went home, not calling the police until later the next day. That would have sent most offenders to jail. Instead, he was allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor and continue as a senator and later as a candidate for President. Many believe that he lost the nomination to President Carter not because of his previous bad behavior, but because he ran such a poor campaign--making the most memorable of his speeches only after he had lost the contest at the Convention in 1980.

He experienced the tremendous pain of the violent death of three brothers, the failure of his first marriage, and various tragedies involving his children, nieces, and nephews. He became the father figure for the children of his slain brothers.

He was a very effective politician--of that there is no doubt. Many speaking from personal acquaintance are writing about his personal kindnesses, his friendliness, his love for his wife, and other good qualities.

But I cannot help but be sobered by the fact that he has now entered eternity, and all the power and political acumen means nothing. He will give account to the Lord for his deeds--and what will matter most is not whether he won a political battle, but whether his name is in the Lamb's book of life.

Cal Thomas, a strong evangelical newspaper columnist, befriended Sen. Kennedy a number of years ago. I am sure that he has shared the Gospel with him--in fact, I seem to recall reading something about that, but cannot be certain. Many say "rest in peace," but that is hard for me, for such peace is only found by those whose faith rests in Jesus alone. We know such faith is a gift, and Sen. Kennedy may have availed himself of the free offer of the gospel. We do not know. We have little to go by here.

Great men in this world still leave it, and must be ready for the next, as must we all.

A very significant essay on current political discontent

2009-08-24T22:46:00.006-04:00

Just read: Fouad Ajami: Obama’s Summer of Discontent - WSJ.com

I tend to agree with Mr. Ajami's analysis, even though I would say that Republican opposition to the President has in many instances misread public concerns related to health care in America. And Republicans were responsible, through President Bush, for the biggest step toward national health care since Medicare/Medicaid with the Prescription Drug Benefit program, so as a party they lack credibility when now saying the government needs to stay out of health care.

The bigger issues that Mr. Ajami raises, though, are telling, and worth considering.

Posted using ShareThis

Another small encouragement for those who believe we are created, not evolved...

2009-08-24T16:11:00.003-04:00

Read The Appendix: Useful and in Fact Promising - Yahoo! News.

Just because it's taken us thousands of years to figure out what the appendix may be good for doesn't mean we can't rely on human intellect and supposition to base our views on how we came into being, does it?

Posted using ShareThis

Honest Bible Reading

2009-08-13T16:05:00.002-04:00

Why is it that when I read many of the great stories of the Bible, I identify with the "hero?" The stories of Jacob's 12 sons leave me thinking about myself in Joseph's sandals, even though I'm a firstborn with only one brother and one sister. David fighting Goliath? Yes, that's me winning battles for my Lord!

But this morning, as I was reading the story of Abram and Lot in Genesis 13, I became very uncomfortable as I slowed down and thought about the story. Abram doesn't want friction between himself and his nephew. He suggests that they separate, and even though he is older and entitled to a first decision, he offers Lot the choice of any direction he wants to go. Lot spies the fertile Jordan valley and especially its southern grasslands extending southward toward (and apparently beyond) what is now the Dead Sea. The other direction is mountains and hills prone to long dry spells (they had just gotten back from Egypt due to famine, which may have been a result of drought). For Lot, this is a "no-brainer," maybe even a "God provided" moment where he is given the chance to have what he believes he needs and certainly wants. So, he takes the choice and takes the fertile pastures of the valley.

What would I have done?

I'm afraid I know. I don't like hard things, and it is very easy to see an easy way ahead open up and believe that "God is in this." In the moment, I could easily have said, "Well, if you really don't care, I'll take the valley, Uncle. Thanks so much for your graciousness!"

Of course, life in the valley meant life around the cities of the valley, including Sodom. Lot gravitated the direction everybody else did, and soon found himself pitching his tent there. If you haven't read the rest of his story--it ends badly, with the only good news coming in 2 Peter 2. There we are told that as bad as things got, his heart was constantly bothered by the sin around him, because deep down he was a righteous man. Just not a very good nephew. Or family man. Or example. Or...

Abram was told by God not to fear that he had lost the best land, and that everything he saw--north, south, east, west--would belong to his descendants. He trusted, even though he didn't see it happen in his lifetime. There was something of greater value to him than immediate gratification, or easy and quick solutions, or guaranteed wealth protection. It was to hear and respond to God's voice. He wasn't perfect, either, but where Lot's slide into ignominy began with an easy choice, Abram's faithfulness was confirmed by his confidence in God's promises.

I pray that I'll keep reading honestly, letting the Word reveal my sins, not just inspire my fantasies.

Funny Clip from "Auto-Tune the News"

2009-07-31T22:18:00.003-04:00

WARNING: John Boehner, on the House floor does say "Hell" in a non-theological context, in this clip.

Crazy Deacon Bob's Christian Discount Emporium

2009-07-28T09:38:00.003-04:00

Follow this link and find something that makes me laugh, and cringe at the same time!

Posted using ShareThis

Why Inerrancy Matters

2009-07-23T11:41:00.003-04:00

A few years ago, I served on my denomination’s local ordination council, and was part of a particularly painful meeting. It was painful because I helped make a judgment that ended a person’s then-current career in ministry. He had what appeared to be a good track record in a ministry and was undergoing our theological examination to determine whether or not we would recommend he receive a ministry credential (in the EFCA, ordination and licensing are acknowledged by the giving of a credential for ministry from the denomination). After three hours of questioning, the council unanimously, but with great regret, had to conclude that we could not recommend the candidate.

What led to this unhappy (and thankfully, rare) conclusion? While the candidate clearly was willing to place himself under the authority of the denomination, he could not personally and without reservation affirm a number of points in our doctrinal statement. The most problematic, it seemed, was the first point: “We believe the Scriptures, both Old and New Testaments, to be the inspired Word of God, without error in the original writings, the complete revelation of His will for the salvation of men and the Divine and final authority for Christian faith and life.”
Now, you might wonder where the disagreement might come. There were more than one, but the main one had to do with the phrase, “without error in the original writings.” This means that when the human authors wrote the various books of the Bible, the Holy Spirit was superintending and directing the process to the extent that what was written was a perfect record of what God wanted to communicate. The objections that were raised were,
1) We can’t define “error” easily, since in the Bible there are references to things that are not exactly correct. For example, when the Bible uses measures of approximation or figures of speech, those expressions are not technically correct. So, are those errors?
2) We don’t have the original manuscripts, so how can we affirm that they were inerrant, or even be sure of what they say?
3) The need for an inerrant scripture assumes that truth is propositional and objective (that means factual statements and existing independently of other factors). Jesus said “…I am the truth,” so truth is a person, not a proposition. The written word becomes the truth as it is indwelt by the Living Word (what this means is the Bible in a sense only comes alive when the presence of Jesus is powerfully present in it, and that presence is realized by the reader).

Before I go on, let me briefly answer these three objections.
1) This shows a faulty understanding of the use of language and of proper biblical interpretation. We interpret the Bible in light of the style and usage of the writer. If approximations and figures of speech are a part of normal, meaningful conversation, their presence in the Scriptures do not constitute error. Further, while some point to existing errors in our available manuscripts, this does not mean the error was present in the original. Wrestling with issues of the text or uncertainty of meanings doesn’t undermine inerrancy; it only shows our imperfect grasp of history and language.
2) To borrow an illustration from Dr. Roger Nicole: if there was a fire at the National Bureau of Standards in Washington, D.C., and the standard yard stick from which all yard sticks were measured were destroyed, would we have to say we have no idea how long a yard is? Of course not. We could take the millions of copies that exist and recreate with great accuracy the original. That is the same thing that goes on with Biblical textual criticism. We may not have the original texts, but we do have the evidence to tell us what they said with an accuracy that allows us to have full confidence in the Scriptures.
3) If truth is not “propositional” and “objective,” then the objection raised against the concept would have no meaning, for you must have propositions to make statements! We would confess that the Holy Spirit must open the eyes of men and women so that they will believe and understand the truth of Scripture, but that is a work within the person, not within the written Word. The Bible is true whether or not it is believed or received as true in a “powerful” way.

Does all of this really matter? Well, if you are asking if a person who does not believe what I have said above can be a Christian, the answer is “yes, he can,” just as many true believers can have faulty theology on any number of issues. The problem comes when we start talking about the authority of the Word of God and the character of the God who has revealed Himself.
The authority problem comes if the Scriptures contain error. Some try to admit error, but limit its scope. They will affirm “The Scriptures are without error in all matters of faith and practice.” This means that “spiritual truth” is without error, but history and science (most notably the creation account), and issues where culture has changed (roles of men and women, family relationships, governmental authority, and other areas) can be mistaken. If, as is maintained by many, Genesis 1-11 is simply the best “creation myth” among many creation myths out there, its authority when it comes to the sanctity of life (“the image of God”), the fall of all mankind into sin, capital punishment for murder, etc., is significantly diminished. If Paul was simply wrong in saying that women should not teach or exercise authority over men (I Timothy 2: 14) due to a cultural bias he possessed, then what else was he wrong about? Should elders not need to meet the qualifications of I Timothy 3 and Titus 1 because those were culturally derived? Should church discipline be set aside as too much of a carry over from Paul’s pharasaical judgmentalism? Once the horse is out of the barn, where can you draw a firm line and say, “there can be no errors past this point?”

The character of God issue has to do with the objections that come when it is argued that fallen man could not produce a perfect revelation. That is agreed by everyone. The real question is, can a perfect God who is omnipotent give a perfect revelation in such a way that imperfect tools (in this case, men), could not mar its original perfection? If He can, then the question is simply, do you believe He could do it but chose to include error? This would make God the author of error, which would violate His character. If He cannot provide a perfect revelation, then He is not truly omnipotent, and cannot overcome our weakness and imperfection. That is extremely bad news.

Thus the question of inerrancy is not ultimately only a question about the reliability of Scripture, but a question about the nature and character of God. That makes it crucial to our faith, and worth taking a stand. It may lead to unpleasant circumstances, but the alternative would be immeasurably worse.

The Sorrows of Fathers and Sons :: Desiring God Christian Resource Library

2009-07-15T13:38:00.002-04:00

This article by John Piper was so powerful, especially for dads, that I've posted the link everywhere I comment.
The Sorrows of Fathers and Sons :: Desiring God Christian Resource Library

Posted using ShareThis

Revenge of the 80s Toys

2009-06-30T13:47:00.000-04:00

Funny Videos | Funny Cartoons | More Video Clips

Coming Back to "Reality"

2009-06-26T11:02:00.002-04:00

I just returned yesterday from leading a group tour to Israel. It was an amazing experience, and even though this was my seventh time, I never cease to learn and to experience wonder while there. One thing we all commented on was the chance to take it in, to study our Bibles along the way, and to talk about so much without the intrusions of pop culture or the news.

Then we flew home.

On our flight, we had our choice of a few hundred movies, TV shows, video games, or a moving map of our plane's route on our personal screens.

At the Atlanta airport, we watched a tearful governor confess that he may have run on family values, but he didn't live them. Surprise--a national profile, plus stupid (not to mention immoral) behavior, will indeed destroy your career aspirations, at least if you are trying to appeal to those who believe in morality. If not, don't worry (think Bill Clinton)unless you break the law (think Eliot Spitzer).

Getting home, I checked my email and my home page news was in mourning over the death of Farrah Fawcett. Her ubiquitous poster and once universal hairstyle notwithstanding, she was not one of our great actresses, she was a celebrity.

Then last night, Michael Jackson's death shocked us all--especially those who, like me, remember his trifecta of hits that dominated pop music--Billie Jean, Thriller, and Beat It, all from the Thriller album of 1982. They were the soundtrack of the early 80s, and that doesn't seem so long ago to me. The media is going into the same hagiographic mode it did when another musical king, Elvis Presley, died (I remember that, too). Both were stars whose time had passed and were trying to recapture their lost glory. In death, Presley became bigger than he was when he died. Jackson will probably do the same.

But as I think about this today, I wonder if life was better during those days when we were in Israel thinking about the flow of God's plan through history, instead of being inundated with commentary about people and events at a level that far exceed their importance. I don't want to get caught up in all the "drama" people seem intent on creating about these things, or acting as if I am overly connected to them (look at all the Twitter and Facebook postings of people who never saw "Charlie's Angels" about Farrah, or those who go on and on about Michael Jackson but never paid much attention to his music, only his rather strange and malleable public persona over the years).

Politicians' failures should be a reminder (and an encouragement) that our trust is not in people, but in God who rules the affairs (no pun intended) of men. The death of celebrities reminds us that the applause of people does not make anyone immortal, and whatever is achieved in this life will be measured by an eternal standard. And when someone whose life has been so much larger than life passes away, we should remember that he, she, and all of us will stand before the righteous judge, and either be vindicated by the righteousness of Jesus Christ, or condemned by our own unrighteousness.

Let current events be reminders, or signposts, pointing us to the paths of biblical truth.

"Finally brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things (Phil. 4:8)."

Article on "The Science of Sex"

2009-06-26T10:49:00.004-04:00

A good brother forwarded this article to me about new research on the physiological impact of sexual activity on the brain, and how that impact, when added into the lives of teens and others engaging in "casual sex," will have devastating emotional and physical consequences. It is very thought-provoking.

While our God's commands are enough to let us know his will, once again we see that what he commands is always for our good, as well as for his glory.

Posted using ShareThis

Piper, Wright, and Justification

2009-06-11T12:50:00.003-04:00

The HUGE debate among evangelicals over justification continues. N.T. Wright, a British Anglican bishop and evangelical scholar, is the leading popular proponent of what has been called the "New Perspective" on Paul. Among other points, this view redefines justification as the ground whereby we claim our place among God's people. Present justification is by faith in Jesus and in the Holy Spirit's power to transform us and produce a life of good works. Future justification before God at the end of the age is based on our good works, not on faith alone. Wright uses Romans 2 to establish this--instead of being an argument against works righteousness, Wright says "the doers of the law will be justified" is a true statement of what will happen in the end.

John Piper has been the most popular (and gracious) opponent of this view, arguing for the historic Reformational idea that justification was, is, and will be the act of God declaring the sinner righteous by faith in the finished work of God in Jesus Christ. He says Wright is wrong, but not heretical. His book, The Future of Justification is his summary critique.

Wright has answered with Justification: God's Plan and Paul's Vision. I am going to be reading this soon, after skimming its contents already, and having some strong questions arise in my mind about Wright's view.

Part of my concern stems from a summary critique of the content in Wright's book, found in two parts here and here. If these summary statements are true, I'm in for a bumpy ride while reading Wright.

I'll keep you posted (pun intended).

Advance 2009 Media and Photos

2009-06-09T12:14:00.003-04:00

This link takes you to all the recordings of the main sessions of Advance 2009, the conference I attended last week. It was a fantastic conference, and these sessions are well worth watching.

Posted using ShareThis

Jon & Kate, Plus the California Supreme Court, Plus Other Stuff

2009-05-26T14:07:00.003-04:00

The following have warranted a paragraph or two because they keep popping up in my world, or on my computer, or on Facebook, or in discussions...

To Jon & Kate...
Jon & Kate Gosselin, of "Jon & Kate Plus 8" fame, need good pastoral counseling. Could I ask if those Christian publishers who gave them their book deal would use some of the wealth generated by the project to bring some sort of pastoral counseling intervention into their lives before we have a much more public and painful tragedy? I don't know if Jon and/or Kate have been unfaithful to their vows, and we don't need to know. But they need help. They need prayer. And they need someone to do more than profit from their lives. Their TV network is milking this for all the publicity that they can get. Maybe the Gosselins (or one of the Gosselins) is, too. Isn't there anyone who can speak truth, grace, love, and perhaps a call to repentance into their lives? Jon & Kate, save your marriage by putting it and each other ahead of yourselves. Give your eight children the example of parents strong enough to do what is both good and right. Call me if there is no pastor available to you.

A Temporary Sanity
The California Supreme Court, by at 6-1 decision, has upheld the voter approved Proposition 8, which banned gay marriage in the state. This came after that same court unanimously ruled that California's earlier ban on same sex marriage was unconstitutional. I honestly am surprised, not on the merits of the decision, but given the flow of events lately and the seeming momentum such a reversal would have followed. This does not settle matters, but it is an encouragement nonetheless.

It Might Be Worse
That may not be too encouraging, but that was my thought in hearing about Judge Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to be our newest Supreme Court justice. I knew it would be a minority pick, and I also was guessing it would be a woman, but the "tokenism" factor was exacerbated by the President's making such a point of her status as a female Hispanic, a Puerto Rican raised in public housing, etc. Early reports on her decisions and reversals are not encouraging to many conservatives. However, I keep thinking it could have been worse. After all, the most liberal (based on voting record and publicly voiced positions) president with a near unstoppable 59 votes in the Senate has suggested someone first made a federal judge by George H. W. Bush. Yes, he also gave us David Souter, but if all that happens is we get a Souter-like nominee, we've escaped a far worse fate. Imagine giving the position to the liberal equivalent of an Antonin Scalia!

Ralph D. Winter, Influential Missiologist and Founder of U.S. Center for World Mission, Dies

2009-05-21T14:22:00.004-04:00

Just read this article in the Christian Post on the passing of Dr. Ralph Winter. Dr. Winter's work at the U.S. Center for World Missions, along with his insightful and sometimes controversial editorials in the Center's Mission Frontiers journal,was monumental in reshaping the cause of global missions. He was at the forefront of the shift from thinking solely about going to countries, and instead targeting people groups.

His leading role in popularizing ideas like "hidden peoples" and the 10/40 Window have led many churches and individuals to rethink their strategies and approaches.

I personally heard Dr. Winter speak a number of times, and was always impressed with how "unimpressive" he was--never trying to be more than a straightforward, passionate advocate for doing ministry in a smart and strategic way. Sometimes I disagreed with his conclusions, but could not fault his spirit.

I rejoice that he is resting from his labors and rejoicing in the Lord's presence. And I think those of us left behind can honor his memory by looking for new ways to complete that final task over which he labored for his Savior--getting the gospel to all peoples.

Muslim Demographics

2009-05-18T14:50:00.001-04:00

This was sent to me by a friend. It paints a sobering portrait of the future, but also reminds us of the need to redouble our efforts to reach Muslims with the Gospel--not for the sake of a culture, but for the glory of God.

Follow up on Creation Care

2009-05-17T21:30:00.004-04:00

This article is a review of the Flourish Conference referenced in my earlier post.

Posted using ShareThis

How High a Priority is Creation Care For Pastors?

2009-05-14T11:01:00.007-04:00

Right now the "Flourish Conference 2009" for pastors is going on in Duluth, GA, at Cross Pointe Church. It features a number of quality speakers and events (Their web site is here). Its defines itself in this way:

Flourish is a national conference for pastors and church leaders, is an invitation to one of culture's most exciting conversations: creation care. Our goal is to explore the biblical call to care for God's creation through the teachings of today's most insightful church leaders.

I believe that humanity was given a mandate to care for the creation; this work was both made more difficult and corrupted by the Fall, but continues as a responsibility of all people. Christians can and should exercise this mandate under the authority of the Word of God.

Having said that, I'm beginning to wonder how many pastors in local congregations, who really shepherd people throughout their week, have time to devote to "creation care," or other issues that may be biblically based but not the highest priority. Elders were to devote themselves to prayer and the ministry of the Word. Paul sets an example in Acts 20 of going personal involvement in discipleship. Peter calls upon us in 1 Peter 5 to shepherd (guide) the flock. Encouragement to recycle and "go green" may be culturally interesting today and deserving of mention when dealing with texts that relate to our creation mandate, but there seem to be a whole range of more important issues my people are dealing with than whether they should consider buying a hybrid car. I'm walking my flock through moral failures, unemployment, life-threatening illness, broken relationships, not to mention the many who need to know the power of the Gospel to save or to heal brokenness. I am teaching, counseling, and praying. I'm trying to watch my own life and walk, even as I seek to lead others.

I would suggest that it might be appropriate for others in the church to become advocates for creation care, but I'm not sure this is central, or even near the center, of the pastoral call. It's a conversation I'm not inclined to take time to participate in.

Awkward Family Photos

2009-05-13T20:24:00.002-04:00

This site has some very funny moments in family photo history.

Posted using ShareThis

'We Are the Forgotten Church,' Say Palestinian Pastors

2009-05-13T13:07:00.002-04:00

Read this post from ChristianPost.com to hear about the evangelical church's challenges in the middle east.

Posted using ShareThis

Between Two Worlds: An Interview with Os Guinness on the 25th Anniversary of Francis Schaeffer's Death

2009-05-12T10:07:00.002-04:00

The interview is here.

Posted using ShareThis

Driscoll & Mars Hill Go National

2009-05-11T12:18:00.000-04:00

I was surprised to come across this blog notice that Mars Hill is establishing a campus in Albuquerque, NM. A little far from the Seattle area, Mars Hill becomes the latest multi-site church to move into multi-state status. What do you think about this move? I'm not sure what I think, myself.

Indian Christians in Orissa Still Struggling (from Desiring God)

2009-05-10T21:45:00.000-04:00

This article updates the situation in the Indian state of Orissa for Christians.

An Ivy Leaguer's Life at Liberty University

2009-04-22T13:15:00.002-04:00

This article recounts the story of a student from Brown University transferring to Liberty University to study the subculture of conservative Christianity and write a book about it.

Practical atheism | Tony Woodlief, in World Magazine.

2009-04-22T13:02:00.000-04:00

Great essay here warning of the real danger to Christian faith's influence.

Baby Preacher

2009-04-22T12:58:00.001-04:00

This did NOT happen at my church! After watching this, you'll see that some aspects of being a Pentecostal style preacher must be genetic!

Will the West Only Watch as China Experiences Recovery?

2009-04-20T15:21:00.000-04:00

OK I haven't been blogging in a while, but saw this fascinating take on Susan Boyle, Western attitudes toward achievement, and the economic recovery. Read it here, from the Asia Times Online.

Pearls Before Breakfast (from the Washington Post)

2009-04-09T22:01:00.000-04:00

One of the world's greatest violinists, Joshua Bell, played anonymously in a D.C. Metro station as a street musician. He went virtually unnoticed.
This amazing story reminds us all of what we may not see or hear if we are not expecting it.

Piper reflects on the anniversary of Dietrich Bonhoeffer's execution

2009-04-09T13:18:00.000-04:00

It was sixty four years ago that Bonhoeffer was killed for his role in a plot against Hitler. His most famous quote, and its context, is reproduced here.

It might encourage you to read or reread The Cost of Discipleship as we approach Easter.

Silly News of the Day: Get a Master's Degree in Facebook Studies--Really!

2009-04-01T12:43:00.000-04:00

This report from England tells of a new degree available for the low, low price of $9,000.00. Birmingham City College will grant a a master's degree in Facebook, Twitter, and MySpace. If they offer experience or life credits, some people I know could go straight to a doctorate.

Shocking News: Guantanamo Detainee Lied; Actually Hates America

2009-03-29T15:52:00.000-04:00

The Weekly Standard carries this report, first filed in the NY Times, that Mullah Zakir, aka Abdullah Ghulam Rasoul, is leading a unified Pakistani/Afghani Taliban against the US and other forces in Afghanistan. This same Mr. Rasoul was detained at Guantanamo, but was released as one of many who testified that he was forced to fight, actually loved what the US was doing in his country, and was a peaceful man. Now it turns out he was not telling the truth, that we actually had a major commander in custody, and now we have returned him to the field to attack and kill our military personnel.

We have been told over and over again that Guantanamo was a bad place, mistreating innocent people. Strangely, our new leaders in Washington can't figure out what to do with those still in our custody, and may even wish that we still had some in hand that have been let go. Mr. Rasoul would be one of those.

Sec. of State Clinton's Religous Gaffe

2009-03-29T15:22:00.000-04:00

This article recounts Sec. of State Clinton's visit to the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadaloupe in Mexico. She brought flowers, then asked who painted the picture of the virgin Mary.

Wrong question.

You see, Roman Catholics believe that the image miraculously appeared, hence the shrine.

Good research, Mrs. Clinton.

Do you think that this would not be news if it had happened under the past administration? Of course, I don't think former Sec. of State Rice would have made such a mistake to begin with.

BTW, it's not that I believe the story told, only that if you are going to act as if someone's traditions matter to you, you ought to make an effort to understand them.

This is funny if you have read Kafka...and maybe if you haven't.

2009-03-26T16:32:00.002-04:00

I tried to post this earlier, but it didn't take.

Prague's Franz Kafka International Named World's Most Alienating Airport

What a day!

2009-03-26T15:44:00.004-04:00

Well, today has offered interesting/encouraging developments along the way (and it isn't over yet!).

First, I had a great time with the class I teach, talking about the concept of being filled with the Spirit, and getting at least some to think about the real possibility that the command of Eph. 5:18-19 holds before them. Kept them all awake, I think.

Then I read two updates from missionaries that were raised up in and sent out by our church in California. One was from a single lady in one of the -stans of Central Asia. As she wrote of the challenges of life in a hostile political environment, she had more to say about the joys of reaching out to people and the embarrassing moments of cross-cultural work than she did about struggle and the hardness of it all (though she has been honest about those matters as well). The other was from a couple laboring in Spain--a post-Christian culture with a Catholic veneer. They have organized a house church and are reaching out in many creative ways to their neighbors. Just reading about a talk J. is giving in a public setting, "Catholic Without Catholicism? Reflections of a 'Separated Brother,'" makes me wish I could be there, and understand Spanish. They are inviting those who come to follow ups in the local coffee house on Sunday afternoon. How cool is that?

Then I got a good dose of encouragement from taking lunch to Dan Knudsen, a student at CU who suffered a spinal injury on a short term missions trip that left him paralyzed, yet still strong in his faith. Ladies from our church prepare lunch for him every Tuesday and Thursday, and while my wife did the preparing, babysitting for our grandson meant I did the taking. Dan isn't feeling great today, but just seeing him, and being around someone facing such challenges with an amazingly positive spirit and trust in God--I am blessed again just thinking about it.

And now I just got a call from a missionary of ours in Peru, telling of the latest ways God has answered prayers to provide for their family in unexpected ways.

A day in the life of a believer looking toward the Lord is never dull!

A "Shocker" for those who follow Israeli Politics

2009-03-24T16:28:00.000-04:00

Breaking News: Israeli Labor Party votes to join Netanyahu gov't

What makes this interesting is that Prime Minister designate Netanyahu is a hardliner, believing circumstances are not right for peace with the Palestinians since they have no true spokesmen (Gaza is in the hands of Hamas, but the U.N. and others have kept Fatah's Abu Mazen in power in the West Bank, even though Hamas has been, until recently, more popular there as well). His natural allies are the more hawkish parties, and he has already made alliances with two of them.

In getting Labor to join his government, Netanyahu bypassed the more centrist (and largest) party in Israel's Knesset, Kadima, which was founded by the late Prime Minister and former head of Netanyahu's Likud party, Ariel Sharon. Kadima wanted greater power in a coalition, including half of the Prime Minister's term for its leader, Tzipi Livni.

Labor is much more "pro-peace," favoring negotiations and territorial concessions. How they will work in this government is anybody's guess, but Netanyahu counts on the fact that that even if not in government, hawkish parties will support him; and Labor, decimated in the last election, may be seeking to stay relevant by being in government rather than in an opposition dominated by Kadima.

The Christian Book of the Year for 2009 is...

2009-03-24T15:39:00.000-04:00

...a Bible! Specifically, the ESV Study Bible, published by Crossway, and setting records for sales of a new Study Bible--it actually sold out in its first printing. I have one, and it is a great, though massive, volume (carrying is advised for the healthy, people with equilibrium problems will fall over trying to walk with it). The notes are very well done, as are the maps, illustrations, and general articles throughout and at the end.

It is an excellent choice, and according the the Christian Book Awards site, the first time they have honored a study Bible, or any Bible, as the Christian Book of the Year--somewhat ironic, don't you think?

Playing with Words...Sigh

2009-03-24T14:01:00.000-04:00

I just read The Weekly Standard's blog article about the new name for what was the "Global War on Terror." Now, it's "The Overseas Contingency Operation." Does anybody know what that means? It sounds like plans for a possible trip to Bermuda.

Of course, our new Secretary of Homeland Security set the stage for this by referring to terrorism as "man caused disasters." That might apply to this season's "Celebrity Apprentice."

And our Treasury Secretary renamed the assets that no bank wants to carry--they are not "toxic" anymore, they are "legacy." Yep, just what you and I want to leave our kids.

Read 1984 by George Orwell, and see if the brazen practice of "doublespeak" there doesn't look familiar.

Of course, it's one thing to rename a war; it's quite another to wage it successfully. The same is true with recognizing evil and ending a recession. We'll see if our government is as clever at overcoming challenges as it is in renaming them.

"It's A Wonderful Tithe"

2009-03-07T14:43:00.002-05:00

Click on the box below to go to a very humorous movie on giving, using "It's a Wonderful Life" as a basis. It's very clever!

How Much is $1 Trillion?

2009-03-05T14:27:00.000-05:00

Go here to see a helpful visualization of just how much $1 trillion is. Then realize that this is less than the proposed new budget put before Congress by the President.

A Powerful Video on Suffering from Joni Eareckson Tada

2009-03-02T19:42:00.002-05:00

The video below is a talk Joni gave at Dallas Seminary about suffering. I found it at Justin Taylor's blog. It is insightful, but then Joni has been someone I have admired for many years. She has been battling increased pain of late, and certainly could use our prayers.

Woman Cited for Breastfeeding While Driving

2009-03-01T17:03:00.002-05:00

This story was in our newspapaper today, and made me wonder about some of the drivers I may meet driving around our area.

Oh, and she was talking on her cell phone, too.

"Losing Faith in the Stimulus"--Liveblog (Christianity Today)

2009-02-10T14:11:00.003-05:00

This article recounts the reactions of economics professors at various Chrstian institutions to the proposed stimulus.

Posted using ShareThis

Matt Chandler on "A Shepherd and His Unregenerate Sheep"

2009-02-09T14:56:00.003-05:00

Matt Chandler is my brother's pastor at The Village Church in Highland Village, TX. I am continually blessed by his preaching, and after hearing this message from the recent Pastor's Conference at Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis, I wanted to share it Go here to see it.

50 De-Stimulating Facts by Stephen Spruiell & Kevin Williamson on National Review Online

2009-02-05T13:58:00.000-05:00

This article from National Review Online gives the lowdown on aspects of the current economic stimulus bill that should give any taxpayer a moment of concern. Will these projects actually help the flow of credit and "stimulate" the economy? That, of course is the offered solution to the current problems. But aside from economists' hopes that we will spend our way to prosperity, we still need to question whether such spending is in the consumer's best interest--should individuals be excited to increase their debt? My post below gives my perspective on this.

Mark Driscoll on Nightline

2009-02-02T14:37:00.001-05:00

This appeared recently, and shows how a mainstream media interviewer understands (an sometimes doesn't) Pastor Mark Driscoll of Mars Hill Church in Seattle (I listen to Driscoll's podcasts). In one of America's least churched cities, Mars Hill is standing strong for orthodox theology and a biblical gospel.

Should the Government Fix The Economy? A Case for Saying "No."

2009-01-28T14:20:00.000-05:00

I really appreciate this article at politico.com arguing against the soon to be passed (it seems) government stimulus bill. I have been thinking more and more that the move just doesn't make sense for long term economic health. Here are some reasons I have.
1. The premise of all the stimulus is that we need consumers to borrow and spend so that the economy can run well. However, the billions of dollars of credit debt racked up by the average American household are not a sign of economic health in the affected households, and encouraging people toward more debt is the last thing they need. Whether we give people a check to spend, or give it to banks to loan, we are not addressing the fundamental problem of having an economy that relies on overspending.
2. The idea that investing in the nation's infrastructure is a good stimulus is ridiculous. How much of this money will get spent in the next few weeks and months? Estimates are that it will take at least 2 years to see half of it spent. How will that lead to economic recovery in the near term? Infrastructure improvements are a good idea, but they are not an economic stimulus.
3. Back to back trillion dollar deficits (expected if this plan passes, and certain if more "stimulus" is called for) will make long term economic health for the national economy unlikely.
4. Government money will lead to greater government control and regulation of banking, of investment, and of those contractors and businesses seeking to do the infrastructure improvements. Already some are objecting that the stimulus bill requires that only companies who verify the legal status of all employees may receive stimulus money. That may be a very good idea for all businesses, but why tie it to the stimulus? And who will enforce this? Will there be an "Office of Stimulus Regulation Compliance?"
5. The rush to pass this will lead to even more waste and mismanagement than most government spending plans. We haven't really thought this through, but various departments and offices will get millions and be told--"spend this now!" It will be a lot of fun for a few people for a little while, but can you imagine all the investigative reports that will be coming out on stimulus waste and how negatively that will affect the credibility of the program, not to mention the government?

This is a moment where people are slowing spending, and even thinking about saving. That is a good thing--a VERY good thing. Will it hurt banks and some businesses in the short and medium term? Yes, it will. But it might just change the fundamentals of our economic planning and policies to encourage living within your means, buying less on credit, and rewarding savings rather than debt. These would be good moves for the families of America.

There's no one as Irish as Barack O'Bama

2009-01-24T17:25:00.001-05:00

This is just a little silliness for the day.

Tim Tebow Video on ESPN

2009-01-22T15:05:00.001-05:00

The Florida Gator's QB is much more than a talented athlete. He is a committed follower of Jesus who spends much of his time in missionary ministry in the Philippines. Watch this video to see a slice of his life.

Follow Up on the Last Post

2009-01-22T14:36:00.003-05:00

This article in the New York Times is a report on the ministry of Tim Keller and Redeemer Prebyterian Church. Note that they rent space in three buildings to meet--one of them is First Baptist Church on the Upper West Side (A side note--Dr. Arthur Williams once pastored this GARBC affiliated church; a rather sad report about the congregation's current needs is found here).

One of my favorite quotes in the story is about the church's approach to having an impact on its culture.

"If you seek power before service, you'll neither get power, nor serve," he said. "If you seek to serve people more than to gain power, you will not only serve people, you will gain influence. That's very much the way Jesus did it."
As a result, one of Redeemer's hallmarks has always been its focus on charity, something it emphasizes in its training of urban pastors. It operates a program called Hope for New York that arranges volunteer opportunities for people from Redeemer with 35 different partner organizations. Last year, 3,300 people from the church volunteered their time.

Read this book!

2009-01-22T14:18:00.003-05:00

The Reason for God by Tim Keller is a refreshing and challenging book on speaking to a skeptical world about God. It is thoroughly engaging, and makes the reader want to know more about the very unique ministry Pastor Keller has in Manhattan--a growing and vibrant tradition PCA church in the midst of one of the most liberal and diverse cultures in the country. Go ahead--read it and let it make you think. You can also visit the website for the book here.